Citation network
Ftc Vs. Bunte Bros., Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 17, 1941
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
FTC v. BunteSearch
-
Bros., Inc. - 312 U.S. 349 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. BunteSearch
-
Bros., Inc., 312 U.S. 349 (1941) Federal Trade Commission v. BunteSearch
-
Federal Trade Comm'n v. KeppelSearch
-
it is equally significant in determining whether such power was actually conferred. See Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
not at this late day rehearse the considerations that led to the Shreveport decision. Houston, E. & W.T. Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Wisconsin Railroad Comm'n v. ChicagoSearch
-
was designed by Congress as a flexible concept with evolving content. Federal Trade Comm'n v. KeppelSearch
-
from Congress. The problem now before us is very different from that which was recently presented by United States v. DarbySearch
-
Counsel for the Commission apparently argued for recognition of the power claimed here in Canfield Oil Co. v. FederalSearch
-
that the Oil Company was engaged in commerce. (2) The jurisdiction sustained in Chamber of Commerce of Minneapolis v. FederalSearch
-
fact that the Chamber conducted a market for grain in the current of interstate commerce. See Chicago Board of Trade v. OlsenSearch
-
U. S. 1 , and cases cited. (3) The order of the Commission reviewed in California Rice Industry v. FederalSearch
-
even though the acts or conduct are intrastate. Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
to the Sherman Act. Federal Trade Commission v. RaladamSearch
-
Federal Trade Commission v. RaladamSearch
-
Co., supra, pp. 283 U. S. 647 -648. And, as this Court said in Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-NutSearch
-
Federal Trade Commission v. KeppelSearch
-
acts dealing with a common or related problem in light of the integrated statutory scheme. See United States v. HutchesonSearch
-
But they are of little aid in interpreting an earlier act in its own legislative setting. See United States v. StewartSearch
-
an interpretation of the Act which would give it control over certain intrastate activities. Canfield Oil Co. v. FederalSearch
-
to have been definitely settled, in 1926, the Commission received some support for its view. See Chamber of Commerce v. FederalSearch
-
Trade Commission, 13 F.2d 673, 684. Cf. American Can Co. v. LadogaSearch
-
Canning Co., 44 F.2d 763, 770, 771. But, in 1939, that power was denied. California Rice Industry v. FederalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. BunteSearch
-
Federal Trade Commission v. BunteSearch
-
See Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Houston, E. & W.T. Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Canfield Oil Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Chamber of Commerce of Minneapolis v. FederalSearch
-
See Chicago Board of Trade v. OlsenSearch
-
California Rice Industry v. FederalSearch
-
Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the Sherman Act. Federal Trade Commission v. RaladamSearch
-
Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-NutSearch
-
See United States v. HutchesonSearch
-
See United States v. StewartSearch
-
See Chamber of Commerce v. FederalSearch
-
Cf. American Can Co. v. LadogaSearch
-
United States v. DarbySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial