Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Nye Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 14, 1941

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

47 entries 4 linked 43 unlinked
Show
  1. Lamb Vs. Cramer US Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1932
  2. Craig Vs. Hecht US Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1923
  3. Union Tool Co. Vs. Wilson US Supreme Court · May 15, 1922
  4. United States Vs. Holmes US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1820
  5. Nye v. United
    Search
  6. States - 313 U.S. 33 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court Nye v. United
    Search
  7. States, 313 U.S. 33 (1941) Nye v. United
    Search
  8. P. 313 U. S. 49 . 6. Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  9. We do not think this was a case of civil contempt. We recently stated, in McCrone v. United
    Search
  10. Elmore's action and the United States was not a party until the appeal, those circumstances, though relevant ( Gompers v. Buck's
    Search
  11. to Guthrie, is also not decisive. As Mr. Justice Brandeis stated in Union Tool Co. v. Wilson
    Search
  12. carry the criminal hallmark. Cf. Gompers v. Buck's
    Search
  13. In 1918, this Court, in Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  14. Page 313 U. S. 48 substantially curtailed by that Act was early recognized by lower federal courts. United States v. Holmes
    Search
  15. United States v. New
    Search
  16. United, States v. Seeley
    Search
  17. United States v. Emerson
    Search
  18. So far as the decisions of this Court are concerned, that view persisted to the time when Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  19. Eilenbecker v. District
    Search
  20. room and within a few feet of the court room and one in the hallway immediately adjoining the court room. See Cooke v. United
    Search
  21. of the Court. Savin, Petitioner, supra. And see Sinclair v. United
    Search
  22. Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  23. of the contempt power. But that is no reason why we should adhere to the construction adopted by Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  24. of this Court are concerned, the statute did not receive any such expanded interpretation until Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  25. which was later approved in Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  26. nature of the contempt proceedings, admonish us not to give renewed vitality to the doctrine of Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  27. the run of illegal acts. Cf. Mr. Justice Holmes, Page 313 U. S. 52 dissenting in Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  28. rule of Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  29. Hillmon v. Mutual
    Search
  30. Morse v. Montana
    Search
  31. Cuyler v. Atlantic
    Search
  32. McCaully v. United
    Search
  33. United States v. Zavelo
    Search
  34. Kirk v. United
    Search
  35. Nelles & King, op. cit., p. 539, citing Ex parte McLeod, 120 F. 130, and United States v. Huff
    Search
  36. Sinclair v. United
    Search
  37. U. S. 255 . Cf. McCann v. New
    Search
  38. of this Court to the contrary, a construction which Congress had not seen fit to change. See Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader
    Search
  39. U.S. Supreme Court Nye v. United
    Search
  40. McCrone v. United
    Search
  41. Gompers v. Buck's
    Search
  42. Cf. Gompers v. Buck's
    Search
  43. See Cooke v. United
    Search
  44. of Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United
    Search
  45. and United States v. Huff
    Search
  46. Cf. McCann v. New
    Search
  47. See Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial