Citation network
California Vs. Thompson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 28, 1941
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 109 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court California v. ThompsonSearch
-
U.S. 109 (1941) California v. ThompsonSearch
-
to Texas by.a carrier who, so far as appears, made only the single trip. P. 313 U. S. 115 . 4. Di Santo v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
trip in question. The state appellate court reversed the judgment of conviction, holding, on the authority of Di Santo v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
to exercise its regulatory power. The statute is not a revenue measure. Cf. Texas Transport & Terminal Co. v. NewSearch
-
as well as interstate, and so does not discriminate against interstate commerce. Cf. Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. PortlandSearch
-
Congress has not exercised its power, even though the regulation affects interstate commerce. Ever since Willson v. BlackbirdSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Creek Marsh Co., 2 Pet. 245, and Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
of this Court, subject only to other applicable constitutional restraints. See cases collected in Di Santo v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
A state may license trainmen engaged in interstate commerce in order to insure their skill and fitness. Smith v. AlabamaSearch
-
Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 96 . It may define the size of crews manning interstate trains. Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ArkansasSearch
-
U. S. 249 , and prescribe regulations for payment of their wages. Erie R. Co. v. WilliamsSearch
-
cars to be heated, and guard posts to be placed on bridges of an interstate railroad. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co. v. NewSearch
-
York, 165 U. S. 628 . It may limit the speed of interstate trains within city limits. Erb v. MoraschSearch
-
U. S. 584 . It may require an interstate railroad to eliminate grade crossings. Erie R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
laws applicable to merchandise moving in interstate commerce as a means of protecting local health. Morgan's S.S. Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
Compagnie Francaise v. BoardSearch
-
and convenient use of its harbors and navigable waterways unless there is conflict with some act of Congress. Willson v. BlackbirdSearch
-
Clyde Mallory Lines v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 261 , 296 U. S. 267 . It may regulate pilots and pilotage in its harbors. Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
provided only that the regulation neither discriminates against nor substantially obstructs the commerce. Turner v. MarylandSearch
-
Patapsco Guana Co. v. NorthSearch
-
South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
not one of prohibiting interstate commerce or licensing it on conditions which restrict or obstruct it. Cf. Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
Dahnke-Walker Co. v. BondurantSearch
-
working instrument of government, has foreclosed regulation, such as the present, by local authority. In Di Santo v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
this Court took a different view. Following what it conceived to be the reasoning of McCall v. CaliforniaSearch
-
that the regulation does not in any other respect unnecessarily obstruct interstate commerce. Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSearch
-
Bradley v. PublicSearch
-
South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
H. P. Welch Co. v. NewSearch
-
Eichholz v. PublicSearch
-
U. S. 598 , 309 U. S. 603 , and see Ziffrin, Inc. v. ReevesSearch
-
uniformity in the regulation of the commerce in matters of national concern. See Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
The decision in the Di Santo case was a departure from this principle, which has been recognized since Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court California v. ThompsonSearch
-
Di Santo v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
of Di Santo v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Cf. Texas Transport & Terminal Co. v. NewSearch
-
Cf. Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. PortlandSearch
-
Willson v. BlackbirdSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial