Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Classic

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 26, 1941

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 16 linked 42 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Birdsall US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1914
  2. United States Vs. Mosley US Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1915
  3. United States Vs. Reese US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  4. Mcpherson Vs. Blacker US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1892
  5. Breedlove Vs. Suttles US Supreme Court · Dec 06, 1937
  6. Swafford Vs. Templeton US Supreme Court · May 19, 1902
  7. Wiley Vs. Sinkler US Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1900
  8. Robertson Vs. Baldwin US Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1897
  9. Mcculloch Vs. Maryland US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1819
  10. Wilson Vs. New US Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1917
  11. Jacob Ruppert Vs. Caffey US Supreme Court · Jan 06, 1920
  12. Nixon Vs. Herndon US Supreme Court · Mar 07, 1927
  13. Nixon Vs. Condon US Supreme Court · May 02, 1932
  14. Lane Vs. Wilson US Supreme Court · May 22, 1939
  15. United States Vs. Gradwell US Supreme Court · Apr 09, 1917
    Relied / Followed
  16. United States Vs. Bathgate US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1918
  17. U.S. 299 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Classic
    Search
  18. U.S. 299 (1941) United States v. Classic
    Search
  19. and 20 are without constitutional sanction, citing United States v. Gradwell
    Search
  20. Newberry v. United
    Search
  21. is confined to the questions of statutory construction and validity decided by the District Court. United States v. Patten
    Search
  22. United States v. Borden
    Search
  23. Applying these provisions, the Louisiana Court of Appeals for the Parish of Orleans has held, in Serpas v. Trebucq
    Search
  24. be lawfully written into the ballot by the electors. Even if, as appellees argue, contrary to the decision in Serpas v. Trebucq
    Search
  25. U. S. 383 . And see Hague v. CIO
    Search
  26. right to vote for representatives in Congress is sometimes spoken of as a right derived from the states, See Minor v. Happersett
    Search
  27. Swasord v. Templeton
    Search
  28. Logan v. United
    Search
  29. Loan v. United
    Search
  30. purposes which were intended to be achieved by the Constitution as a continuing instrument of government. Cf. Davidson v. New
    Search
  31. Brown v. Walker
    Search
  32. includes in any circumstances the power to regulate primary elections was reserved in United States v. Gradwell
    Search
  33. supra, 243 U. S. 487 . In Newberry v. United
    Search
  34. constitutional right of choice. This was noted and extensively commented upon by the concurring Justices in Newberry v. United
    Search
  35. Houston & Texas Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  36. First National Bank v. Union
    Search
  37. Hamilton v. Page
    Search
  38. Smith v. Kansas
    Search
  39. In Ex parte Yarbrough, supra, and in United States v. Mosley
    Search
  40. Such is our function here. Conspiracy to prevent the official count of a citizen's ballot, held in United States v. Mosley
    Search
  41. other constitutional rights which are wholly unrelated to the choice of a representative in Congress. United States v. Waddell
    Search
  42. Motes v. United
    Search
  43. Guinn v. United
    Search
  44. right to participate in primary, as well as general, elections secured to all citizens by the Constitution, see Guinn v. United
    Search
  45. in the same manner and to the same extent as the right to vote at the general election. United States v. Mosley
    Search
  46. supra. It is no extension of the criminal statute, as it was not of the civil statute in Nixon v. Herndon
    Search
  47. wholly different situations not now before us may not be found to involve such an interference, cf. United States v. Bathgate
    Search
  48. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Classic
    Search
  49. the District Court. United States v. Patten
    Search
  50. Serpas v. Trebucq
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial