Citation network
GriffIn Vs. Mccoach
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 02, 1941
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 498 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court Griffin v. McCoachSearch
-
U.S. 498 (1941) Griffin v. McCoachSearch
-
a federal court in diversity of citizenship cases are those of the State in which the federal court sits. Klaxon Co. v. StentorSearch
-
none. Hence, the personal representative was entitled to recover their portions of the policy for the estate. Wilke v. FinnSearch
-
original policy, they did not amount to new contracts or change the governing law. Cf. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. DunkenSearch
-
was sought and allowed, 312 U.S. 676, on the ground, among others, of a conflict between the instant case and Sampson v. ChannellSearch
-
court must apply the conflict of laws rules of the state where it sits. For the reasons given in Klaxon Company v. StentorSearch
-
Texas law or Texas decisions, but upon decisions of this Court inapplicable to this situation in the light of Erie R. v. TompkinsSearch
-
U. S. 64 , and Ruhlin v. NewSearch
-
But this is something to be decided according to Texas decisions to none of which the opinion refers. Cf. Wilke v. FinnSearch
-
Cheeves v. AndersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
do not, in our opinion, decide this question. Overby v. GordonSearch
-
the courts of the District of Columbia in a suit to determine anew decedent's domicile. New York Life Insurance Co. v. HeadSearch
-
because the agreement, valid in New York, was contrary to the public policy of the former was not discussed. In Bond v. HumeSearch
-
excepts claimed rights so contrary to the law of the forum as to subvert the forum's view of public policy. Cf. Loucks v. StandardSearch
-
decisions which refused to enforce a valid foreign contract of guarantyship against a married woman. Union Trust Co. v. GrosmanSearch
-
valid foreign contracts which required the doing of prohibited acts within the state of the forum. Bothwell v. Buckbee-MearsSearch
-
it has recognized that a state is not required to enforce a law obnoxious to its public policy. Bradford Electric Co. v. ClapperSearch
-
Hartford Indemnity Co. v. DeltaSearch
-
beyond the state's borders with no relation to anything done or to be done within the borders. Home Insurance Co., v. DickSearch
-
in the Delta case, the time for notice varied in the two jurisdictions. In New York Life Insurance Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
Cf. Miller v. CampbellSearch
-
Cf. Union Trust Co. v. GrosmanSearch
-
Compare Griggsby v. RussellSearch
-
Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. SchaeferSearch
-
Cf. Sampson v. ChannellSearch
-
New York Life Insurance Co. v. HeadSearch
-
Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. DunkenSearch
-
Before Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSearch
-
Court decided as a matter of general law that, where time of notice is important, the foreign law governs. Boseman v. InsuranceSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Griffin v. McCoachSearch
-
Klaxon Co. v. StentorSearch
-
Wilke v. FinnSearch
-
Cf. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. DunkenSearch
-
and Sampson v. ChannellSearch
-
Klaxon Company v. StentorSearch
-
of Erie R. v. TompkinsSearch
-
and Ruhlin v. NewSearch
-
Cf. Wilke v. FinnSearch
-
In Bond v. HumeSearch
-
Cf. Loucks v. StandardSearch
-
Bothwell v. Buckbee-MearsSearch
-
Bradford Electric Co. v. ClapperSearch
-
In New York Life Insurance Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
Boseman v. InsuranceSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial