Citation network
Alabama Vs. King and Boozer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 10, 1941
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Alabama v. KingSearch
-
Boozer - 314 U.S. 1 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court Alabama v. KingSearch
-
Boozer, 314 U.S. 1 (1941) Alabama v. KingSearch
-
burden of the tax is passed on to the United States does not make it a tax upon the United States. Panhandle Oil Co. v. KnoxSearch
-
U. S. 218 , and Graves v. TexasSearch
-
from the purchaser upon collection of the price, whether the sale is for cash or on credit. See Lone Star Cement Corp. v. StateSearch
-
Long v. RobertsSearch
-
National Linen Service Corp. v. StateSearch
-
Wood Preserving Corp. v. StateSearch
-
so as to infringe the constitutional immunity, citing Panhandle Oil Co. v. KnoxSearch
-
Graves v. TexasSearch
-
Government and who have been granted no tax immunity. So far as a different view has prevailed, see Panhandle Oil Co. v. KnoxSearch
-
Co., supra, we think it no longer tenable. See Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Trinityfarm Co. v. GrosjeanSearch
-
James v. DravoSearch
-
Graves v. NewSearch
-
contractors the status of agents of the Government to enter into contracts or to pledge its credit. See United States v. AlgomaSearch
-
not obligate it to the contractor's vendor under a cost-plus contract more than under a lump sum contract. Cf. James v. DravoSearch
-
of the Government immunity than did the tax laid upon the contractor's gross receipts from the Government in James v. DravoSearch
-
Contracting Co., supra. See Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSearch
-
the argument, the Government conceded that this was not the usual practice. The invoices appearing of record in Curry v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Alabama v. KingSearch
-
the United States. Panhandle Oil Co. v. KnoxSearch
-
and Graves v. TexasSearch
-
See Lone Star Cement Corp. v. StateSearch
-
Panhandle Oil Co. v. KnoxSearch
-
See Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSearch
-
See United States v. AlgomaSearch
-
Cf. James v. DravoSearch
-
Curry v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial