Citation network
Gray Vs. Powell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 01, 1941
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 402 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court Gray v. PowellSearch
-
U.S. 402 (1941) Gray v. PowellSearch
-
the spring of 1936, two extensions of six weeks each were agreed upon, specifically in view of the case of Carter v. CarterSearch
-
The Bituminous Coal Act of 1937 followed the invalidation of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 by Carter v. CarterSearch
-
U. S. 238 , and the abandonment of the N.R.A.Code of Fair Competition after the decision in Schechter Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
reached that price stabilization offered the best remedy. The industry found the same answer. Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
This Court has determined that the present 1937 act is within the constitutional powers of Congress. Sunshine Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
and arguments to the decisive body, and an application of the statute in a just and reasoned manner. Shields v. UtahSearch
-
the evidentiary facts, that does not permit a court to substitute its judgment for that of the Director. United States v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. UnitedSearch
-
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
as, for instance, carrying on a common business through two corporations -- may create legal liability, Edwards v. ChileSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
such relation to other connections may result in diversity of legal treatment. Compare, for instance, United States v. DelawareSearch
-
Hudson Co., 213 U. S. 366 , and United States v. DelawareSearch
-
now must bear the burdens of a determination that other entities than itself are the producers. Cf. Superior Coal Co. v. DepartmentSearch
-
a deliberately chosen arrangement for conducting business affairs does not lie with the creator of the plan. Higgins v. SmithSearch
-
percent exercise. We said in Sunshine Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
cannot be said to put a meaning on disposal limited to the inclusion. Cf. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. BismarckSearch
-
of whether the Seaboard is a producer under the act. Congressional power over that problem is beyond dispute. Currin v. WallaceSearch
-
Sunshine Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
Cf. Consolidated Indiana Coal Co. v. NationalSearch
-
Keystone Mining Co. v. GraySearch
-
Treasury -- United States v. JohnstonSearch
-
Interior -- Swamp lands -- Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. McComasSearch
-
Customs Appraisers -- Passavant v. UnitedSearch
-
Post Office -- Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Gray v. PowellSearch
-
of Carter v. CarterSearch
-
Carter v. CarterSearch
-
Schechter Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
of Congress. Sunshine Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
Shields v. UtahSearch
-
of the Director. United States v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Edwards v. ChileSearch
-
United States v. DelawareSearch
-
and United States v. DelawareSearch
-
Cf. Superior Coal Co. v. DepartmentSearch
-
Higgins v. SmithSearch
-
Cf. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. BismarckSearch
-
Passavant v. UnitedSearch
-
Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSearch
-
United States v. DarbySearch
-
United States v. JohnstonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial