Citation network
United States Vs. Kales
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 08, 1941
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 186 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. KalesSearch
-
U.S. 186 (1941) United States v. KalesSearch
-
of the assessment with interest. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the judgment, Woodworth v. KalesSearch
-
with interest, upon the ground that the Ford stock, as the Board of Tax Appeals had then determined in James Couzens v. CommissionerSearch
-
and lack of specificity have been remedied by amendment filed after the lapse of the statutory period. United States v. MemphisSearch
-
United States v. FactorsSearch
-
Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSearch
-
case where such a claim has not misled the Commissioner and he has accepted and treated it as such. Bonwit Teller Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
against former Ford stockholders who had sold stock which they had acquired before March 1, 1913. See James Couzens v. CommissionerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to the circumstances of making it, rightly be taken as an assertion of a present right. See Georgia, F, & A. Ry. Co. v. BlishSearch
-
George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSearch
-
United States v. RichardsSearch
-
as to the formality and particularity with which the grounds for refund are required to be stated. Bonwit Teller Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Tucker v. AlexanderSearch
-
United States v. GarbuttSearch
-
been set up for the recovery from an internal revenue collector of taxes which he had unlawfully collected. See Sage v. UnitedSearch
-
taxes gave rise to a common law cause of action against the collector for restitution of the overpayment. Elliott v. SwarthwoutSearch
-
relieving himself, by payment into the Treasury of the moneys collected, from liability to make restitution. Elliott v. SwarthwoutSearch
-
Smietanka v. IndianaSearch
-
a suit against the Government, at least so far as the ultimate incidence of the liability is concerned, United States v. ShermanSearch
-
since it was thought that the statutory command had relieved the collectors from personal liability. See Cary v. CurtisSearch
-
revenue collectors to pay moneys collected to the Government was resolved by this Court's decisions in Philadelphia v. TheSearch
-
the United States is a Page 314 U. S. 200 stranger except as it has obligated itself to pay it. See Sage v. UnitedSearch
-
upon payment to the other, even though the two collections are for taxes arising out of the same transaction. Sage v. UnitedSearch
-
Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSearch
-
Sunshine Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. KalesSearch
-
Woodworth v. KalesSearch
-
James Couzens v. CommissionerSearch
-
Bonwit Teller Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
See James Couzens v. CommissionerSearch
-
See Georgia, F, & A. Ry. Co. v. BlishSearch
-
George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSearch
-
Tucker v. AlexanderSearch
-
See Sage v. UnitedSearch
-
Elliott v. SwarthwoutSearch
-
See Cary v. CurtisSearch
-
Philadelphia v. TheSearch
-
Sage v. UnitedSearch
-
Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSearch
-
Arnson v. MurphySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial