Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Texas

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 22, 1941

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 3 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Emory US Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1941
  2. New York Vs. Maclay US Supreme Court · Feb 06, 1933
  3. United States Vs. Knott US Supreme Court · May 25, 1936
  4. U.S. 480 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Texas
    Search
  5. U.S. 480 (1941) United States v. Texas
    Search
  6. court certified the controlling questions to the Supreme Court of Texas. The Supreme Court, on the authority of State v. Wynne
    Search
  7. require that the claim of Texas be first satisfied, that of Dailey second, and that of the United States third. State v. Nix
    Search
  8. not completely satisfy even the claim of Texas and that Dailey, and the United States would receive nothing. State v. Nix
    Search
  9. of Texas to the contrary, that section clearly applies to this proceeding. As we recently remarked in United States v. Emory
    Search
  10. decisions, this Court read an exception into the section in the case of previously executed mortgages. Thelusson v. Smith
    Search
  11. Conard v. Atlantic
    Search
  12. Brent v. Bank
    Search
  13. that mortgaged property passes to the mortgagee, and is no longer a part of the estate of the mortgagor. See Conard v. Atlantic
    Search
  14. execution of the judgment has proceeded far enough to take the land out of the possession of the debtor. Thelusson v. Smith
    Search
  15. In Spokane County v. United
    Search
  16. would have been. 279 U.S. at 279 U. S. 95 . The New York statute in New York v. Maclay
    Search
  17. in Article 7065a-7. And the priority which attached to the claim of the United States on that day ( United States v. Oklahoma
    Search
  18. had been determined, and it could not be enforced without the assistance of the courts. Like the tax lien in New York v. Maclay
    Search
  19. In United States v. Oklahoma
    Search
  20. in United States v. Knott
    Search
  21. State v. Wynne
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Texas
    Search
  23. of State v. Wynne
    Search
  24. State v. Nix
    Search
  25. Thelusson v. Smith
    Search
  26. See Conard v. Atlantic
    Search
  27. United States v. Oklahoma
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial