Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Helvering Vs. Lerner Stores Corp.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 22, 1941

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 2 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Haggar Co. Vs. Helvering US Supreme Court · Jan 02, 1940
  2. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. Vs. Adkins US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  3. Helvering v. Lerner
    Search
  4. Stores Corp. - 314 U.S. 463 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court Helvering v. Lerner
    Search
  5. Stores Corp., 314 U.S. 463 (1941) Helvering v. Lerner
    Search
  6. for which an extension might have been allowed by the Commissioner if application for it had been made. Scaife Company v. Commissioner
    Search
  7. U. S. 465 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a companion case to Scaife Co. v. Commissioner
    Search
  8. the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining the Commissioner was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Lerner Stores Corp. v. Commissioner
    Search
  9. urge in support of the judgment under review grounds rejected Page 314 U. S. 467 by the court below. Langnes v. Green
    Search
  10. Public Service Commission of Puerto Rico v. Havemeyer
    Search
  11. McGoldrick v. Compagnie
    Search
  12. U. S. 434 . The constitutional issues, however, are without substance. As we noted in Haggar Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  13. by providing a formula which would in such circumstances result in an increase in the excess profits tax. Haggar Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  14. of a tax raises no question under the Fifth Amendment, which contains no equal protection clause. La Belle Iron Works v. United
    Search
  15. to a specified criterion of value of capital stock is not open to challenge in the courts. La Belle Iron Works v. United
    Search
  16. true, there is no constitutional reason why Congress may not, because of administrative convenience alone ( Carmichael v. Southern
    Search
  17. of taxpayers to place a fair valuation on their capital stock. As was stated in Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. McGowan
    Search
  18. of the Constitution. La Belle Iron Works v. United
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Helvering v. Lerner
    Search
  20. Scaife Company v. Commissioner
    Search
  21. Scaife Co. v. Commissioner
    Search
  22. the Circuit Court of Appeals. Lerner Stores Corp. v. Commissioner
    Search
  23. Langnes v. Green
    Search
  24. La Belle Iron Works v. United
    Search
  25. Carmichael v. Southern
    Search
  26. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. McGowan
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial