Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Cobbledick Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 26, 1940

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 3 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Hale Vs. Henkel US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  2. Burdeau Vs. Mcdowell US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1921
  3. United States Vs. Sanges US Supreme Court · Apr 04, 1892
  4. Cobbledick v. United
    Search
  5. States - 309 U.S. 323 (1940) U.S. Supreme Court Cobbledick v. United
    Search
  6. States, 309 U.S. 323 (1940) Cobbledick v. United
    Search
  7. must await his conviction Page 309 U. S. 326 before its reconsideration by an appellate tribunal. Cogen v. United
    Search
  8. Mr. Chief Justice Taft, in Segurola v. United
    Search
  9. litigation could not be party to an appeal taken at the conclusion of the main cause. Such was the ruling in Alexander v. United
    Search
  10. U. S. 43 , 201 U. S. 66 , of the most ancient lineage. See Wilson v. United
    Search
  11. than that afforded by the district court until the witness chooses to disobey and is committed for contempt. See Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  12. supra, and Wilson v. United
    Search
  13. his alternatives are to abandon the claim or languish in jail. This analysis of finality is illustrated by Perlman v. United
    Search
  14. of the district court directing the witness to answer have been held final and reviewable. Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Brimson
    Search
  15. Harriman v. Interstate
    Search
  16. Ellis v. Interstate
    Search
  17. See United States v. More
    Search
  18. of right was allowed in capital cases. 25 Stat. 655, 656. For the history of federal criminal appeal see United States v. Sanges
    Search
  19. Compare Go-Bart Co. v. United
    Search
  20. But the practical considerations there involved were entirely different from those which must govern here. In Burdeau v. McDowell
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Cobbledick v. United
    Search
  22. Cogen v. United
    Search
  23. Segurola v. United
    Search
  24. Alexander v. United
    Search
  25. See Wilson v. United
    Search
  26. See Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  27. and Wilson v. United
    Search
  28. Perlman v. United
    Search
  29. Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Brimson
    Search
  30. In Burdeau v. McDowell
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial