Citation network
Russell Vs. Todd
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 26, 1940
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 280 (1940) U.S. Supreme Court Russell v. ToddSearch
-
U.S. 280 (1940) Russell v. ToddSearch
-
the three-year statute of limitations in a suit to enforce the liability of stockholders of a state bank in Platt v. WilmotSearch
-
cf., as to liability of stockholders of national banks, McDonald v. ThompsonSearch
-
levy an assessment on the stockholders of an insolvent bank, or to maintain a suit to enforce their liability. Wheeler v. GreeneSearch
-
Christopher v. BrusselbankSearch
-
Brusselback v. CagoSearch
-
necessary parties to ascertain their rights and liabilities, and to adjust and settle them by its decrees. Pollard v. BaileySearch
-
and each shareholder then becomes liable in a suit at law for the amount of the assessment. See Christopher v. BrusselbackSearch
-
resort to a federal court of equity is the legal remedy which federal, rather than state, courts afford. Di Giovanni v. CamdenSearch
-
Atlas Life Insurance Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
applies as well to rules established by judicial decision in the states as those established by statute. Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
not aid a plaintiff whose unexcused delay, if the suit were allowed, would be prejudicial to the defendant. Wagner v. BairdSearch
-
Philippi v. PhilippeSearch
-
Courtner v. UnitedSearch
-
or the right of entry for the assertion of a comparable legal interest in the land would be barred. Elmendorf v. TaylorSearch
-
Hovenden v. LordSearch
-
the law, would refuse its aid if the legal right had been barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Carrol v. GreenSearch
-
limitations applicable to the equitable causes of action in the judicial district in which the case is heard. Bacon v. HowardSearch
-
Clarke v. Boorman'sSearch
-
Boone County v. BurlingtonSearch
-
Benedict v. CitySearch
-
Rules of Decision Act, would be unenforceable in the federal courts of law as well as in the state courts. Wilson v. KoontzSearch
-
Hughes v. ReedSearch
-
remedy in like cases, the federal court is remitted to and applies the doctrine of laches as controlling. Wagner v. BairdSearch
-
Kirby v. LakeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Russell v. ToddSearch
-
See Christopher v. BrusselbackSearch
-
Di Giovanni v. CamdenSearch
-
Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial