Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Anderson Vs. Helvering

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 20, 1940

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 9 linked 49 unlinked
Show
  1. Helvering Vs. O'Donnell US Supreme Court · Mar 07, 1938
  2. Thomas Vs. Perkins US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1937
  3. Palmer Vs. Bender US Supreme Court · Jan 09, 1933
  4. Helvering Vs. Clifford US Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1940
  5. Murphy Oil Co. Vs. Burnet US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1932
  6. Burnet Vs. Harmel US Supreme Court · Nov 07, 1932
  7. Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. Vs. Burnet US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1932
  8. Reinecke Vs. Smith US Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1933
  9. United States Vs. Ludey US Supreme Court · May 16, 1927
  10. U.S. 404 (1940) U.S. Supreme Court Anderson v. Helvering
    Search
  11. U.S. 404 (1940) Anderson v. Helvering
    Search
  12. issue is who has a capital investment in the oil and gas in place, and what is the extent of his interest. Helvering v. Bankline
    Search
  13. Helvering v. Elbe
    Search
  14. Helvering v. Twin
    Search
  15. U. S. 551 . Compare Helvering v. Clifford
    Search
  16. is said to resemble a manufacturing Page 310 U. S. 408 business carried on by the use of the soil. Burnet v. Harmel
    Search
  17. Bankers' Coal Co. v. Burnet
    Search
  18. United States v. Biwabik
    Search
  19. Von Baumbach v. Sargent
    Search
  20. Stratton's Independence v. Howbert
    Search
  21. is likened to the depreciation of machinery or the using up of raw materials in manufacturing. United States v. Ludey
    Search
  22. Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens
    Search
  23. Co., 267 U. S. 364 , 267 U. S. 370 . Compare Von Baumbach v. Sargent
    Search
  24. for the capital assets consumed in the production of income through the severance of the minerals. Helvering v. Bankline
    Search
  25. allowance as a tax free return of the capital consumed in the production of gross income through severance. Helvering v. Twin
    Search
  26. United States v. Dakota-Montana
    Search
  27. production and is granted a deduction from gross income as compensation for the consumption of his capital. See Burnet v. Harmel
    Search
  28. in the oil in place which is depleted by severance. Palmer v. Bender
    Search
  29. U. S. 103 . See Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens
    Search
  30. when included in a royalty lease, are regarded as advance royalties, and are given the same tax consequences. Burnet v. Harmel
    Search
  31. U. S. 308 . Compare Helvering v. Elbe
    Search
  32. to a depletion allowance even though continued production is essential to the realization of such profits. Helvering v. O'Donnell
    Search
  33. well is denied a depletion allowance on the difference between the contract price and the fair market value. Helvering v. Bankline
    Search
  34. Helvering v. Bankline
    Search
  35. Oil Co., supra, at 303 U. S. 367 . Thomas v. Perkins
    Search
  36. received by the assignors from the sale of the oil were deemed not to be income to the assignees. See also Palmer v. Bender
    Search
  37. lessor and lessee of both the gross income derived from production and the allowance for depletion. Compare Burnet v. Harmel
    Search
  38. U. S. 103 , 287 U. S. 106 -107. Accordingly, this Court, in Thomas v. Perkins
    Search
  39. conveyancer's art, but rested upon the practical consequences of the provision for payments of that type. See Palmer v. Bender
    Search
  40. S. 103 , 287 U. S. 111 . The Government maintains that the present case is distinguishable from Thomas v. Perkins
    Search
  41. in oil, is of no moment in determining the issues presented for decision. Compare, however, General Utilities Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  42. second, to the vendee owner upon the production of oil. Helvering v. Twin
    Search
  43. type of security for the deferred payments serves to distinguish Page 310 U. S. 413 this case from Thomas v. Perkins
    Search
  44. case, it is true, some of the payments received may come directly out of the oil produced. But our decision in Thomas v. Perkins
    Search
  45. and of the allowance for depletion between transferor and transferee. In the interests of a workable rule, Thomas v. Perkins
    Search
  46. from the oil production, notwithstanding the arrangement to pay over such proceeds to Oklahoma Company. See Helvering v. Clifford
    Search
  47. U.S. Supreme Court Anderson v. Helvering
    Search
  48. Compare Helvering v. Clifford
    Search
  49. Compare Von Baumbach v. Sargent
    Search
  50. See Burnet v. Harmel
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial