Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Arkansas Vs. Tennessee

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 03, 1940

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 37 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 563 (1940) U.S. Supreme Court Arkansas v. Tennessee
    Search
  2. U.S. 563 (1940) Arkansas v. Tennessee
    Search
  3. was concluded in 1783, subject to such subsequent changes as occurred through natural and gradual processes. Arkansas v. Tennessee
    Search
  4. Arkansas v. Mississippi
    Search
  5. a tax sale by a Tennessee sheriff in 1848 covering lands on the island. The bill of exceptions in the case of Moss v. Gibbs
    Search
  6. island, collected the taxes on them, and served process there. The opinion of the Supreme Court of Tennessee in Moss v. Gibbs
    Search
  7. The Master added that, if he was mistaken in thinking it proper to consider the depositions and opinion in Moss v. Gibbs
    Search
  8. purchase of Blue Grass Towhead, but no action was taken thereon. The opinion of the Supreme Court of Tennessee in Moss v. Gibbs
    Search
  9. between States cannot be sustained. That principle has had repeated recognition by this Court. In Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
    Search
  10. Applying this principle in Indiana v. Kentucky
    Search
  11. Again, in Louisiana v. Mississippi
    Search
  12. Virginia v. Tennessee
    Search
  13. Maryland v. West
    Search
  14. Vermont v. New
    Search
  15. Hampshire, 289 U. S. 593 , 289 U. S. 613 . In Michigan v. Wisconsin
    Search
  16. is a doctrine not confined to individuals, but applicable to sovereign nations as well, Direct United States Cable Co. v. Anglo-American
    Search
  17. as between the States of the Union, is in no way disregarded or impaired by our decisions in Arkansas v. Tennessee
    Search
  18. supra, and Arkansas v. Mississippi
    Search
  19. and is intended to safeguard to each State equality of access and right of navigation in the stream. Iowa v. Illinois
    Search
  20. Minnesota v. Wisconsin
    Search
  21. Wisconsin v. Michigan
    Search
  22. thalweg, but remains at the original line, although now on dry land because the old channel has filled up. Nebraska v. Iowa
    Search
  23. Arkansas v. Tennessee
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Arkansas v. Tennessee
    Search
  25. of Moss v. Gibbs
    Search
  26. Moss v. Gibbs
    Search
  27. Court. In Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
    Search
  28. Louisiana v. Mississippi
    Search
  29. Virginia v. Tennessee
    Search
  30. In Michigan v. Wisconsin
    Search
  31. Direct United States Cable Co. v. Anglo-American
    Search
  32. and Arkansas v. Mississippi
    Search
  33. New Jersey v. Delaware
    Search
  34. Missouri v. Nebraska
    Search
  35. Indiana v. Kentucky
    Search
  36. Iowa v. Illinois
    Search
  37. Nebraska v. Iowa
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales