Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Deckert Vs. Independence Shares Corp.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 09, 1940

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 4 linked 35 unlinked
Show
  1. Beebe Vs. Russell US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1856
  2. Craighead Vs. Wilson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1855
  3. Forgay Vs. Conrad US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1848
  4. Tyler Vs. Savage US Supreme Court · Feb 01, 1892
  5. Deckert v. Independence
    Search
  6. Shares Corp. - 311 U.S. 282 (1940) U.S. Supreme Court Deckert v. Independence
    Search
  7. Shares Corp., 311 U.S. 282 (1940) Deckert v. Independence
    Search
  8. the Circuit Court of Appeals was authorized to consider the appeals from the temporary injunction. Compare Enelow v. New
    Search
  9. Shanferoke Coal & Supply Corp. v. Westchester
    Search
  10. Meccano, Ltd. v. Wanamaker
    Search
  11. U. S. 136 , 253 U. S. 141 . See also Eagle Glass & Mfg. Co. v. Rowe
    Search
  12. Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw
    Search
  13. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover
    Search
  14. Smith v. Vulcan
    Search
  15. the motions to dismiss, although generally it could consider such an order only on appeal from a final decision. Reed v. Lehman
    Search
  16. Miller v. Pyrites
    Search
  17. Co., Inc., 71 F.2d 804. Compare Gillespie v. Schram
    Search
  18. Rodriguez v. Arosemena
    Search
  19. Kneberg v. H.L
    Search
  20. Satterlee v. Harris
    Search
  21. in equity, at least where there are circumstances making the legal remedy inadequate, is well established. Tyler v. Savage
    Search
  22. Montgomery v. Bucyrus
    Search
  23. Boyce v. Grundy
    Search
  24. Prendergast v. New
    Search
  25. and should have been reversed only if petitioners were not entitled to any equitable relief. See Meccano, Ltd. v. Wanamaker
    Search
  26. Together with No. 18, Deckert et al. v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  27. In Falk v. Hoffman
    Search
  28. Central California Canneries Co. v. Dunkley
    Search
  29. George v. Victor
    Search
  30. Talking Machine Co., 293 U. S. 377 . See Latta v. Kilbourn
    Search
  31. McGourkey v. Toledo
    Search
  32. Hill v. Chicago
    Search
  33. U.S. Supreme Court Deckert v. Independence
    Search
  34. Compare Enelow v. New
    Search
  35. Eagle Glass & Mfg. Co. v. Rowe
    Search
  36. Reed v. Lehman
    Search
  37. Compare Gillespie v. Schram
    Search
  38. See Meccano, Ltd. v. Wanamaker
    Search
  39. See Latta v. Kilbourn
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales