Citation network
Minnesota Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 03, 1939
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Minnesota v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 305 U.S. 382 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court Minnesota v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 305 U.S. 382 (1939) Minnesota v. UnitedSearch
-
Carr v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 255 . Compare Utah Power & Light Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
The exemption of the United States from being sued without its consent extends to a suit by a state. Compare Kansas v. UnitedSearch
-
Arizona v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 558 , 298 U. S. 568 , 298 U. S. 571 -572. Compare Minnesota v. HitchcockSearch
-
Finn v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. GarbuttSearch
-
although, in a like suit originally brought in a federal court, it would have had jurisdiction. Lambert Run Coal Co. v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
General Investment Co. v. LakeSearch
-
not a dry legal title divorced from substantial powers and responsibilities with relation to the land. United States v. RickertSearch
-
Tiger v. WesternSearch
-
may sue to cancel the judgment and set aside the conveyance made pursuant thereto. Bowling and Miami Investment Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Privett v. UnitedSearch
-
Sunderland v. UnitedSearch
-
States is therefore an indispensable party to any suit to establish or acquire an interest in the lands. Compare McKay v. KalytonSearch
-
Compare McKay v. KalytonSearch
-
to apply only to the federal courts unless there is an explicit reference to the state tribunals, citing Stanley v. SchwalbySearch
-
United States v. InabaSearch
-
United States v. DeasySearch
-
F.2d 108, 110. This is not universally true even as to suits against the United States itself. United States v. JonesSearch
-
which directly affect its property interests without such specific statutory authorization. Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. AultSearch
-
Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Olson v. UnitedSearch
-
Federal Land Bank v. PriddySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Minnesota v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Utah Power & Light Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Kansas v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Minnesota v. HitchcockSearch
-
Lambert Run Coal Co. v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Tiger v. WesternSearch
-
Bowling and Miami Investment Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. JonesSearch
-
Stanley v. SchwalbySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial