Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Southern Pacific Co. Vs. Gallagher

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 30, 1939

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

64 entries 7 linked 57 unlinked
Show
  1. Brennan Vs. Titusville US Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1894
  2. Oliver Iron Mining Co. Vs. Lord US Supreme Court · May 07, 1923
  3. Hope Natural Gas Co. Vs. Hall US Supreme Court · May 16, 1927
  4. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co. Vs. Johnson US Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1938
  5. Frick Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1925
  6. ChamplaIn Realty Co. Vs. Brattleboro US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1922
  7. Atlantic Lumber Co. Vs. Commissioner US Supreme Court · May 25, 1936
  8. U.S. 167 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher
    Search
  9. U.S. 167 (1939) Southern Pacific Co. v. Gallagher
    Search
  10. are subject to local taxation. Helson & Randolph v. Kentucky
    Search
  11. applied to property brought into the state after its retail purchase for intrastate use has been upheld in Henneford v. Silas
    Search
  12. was effective. The interstate movement was complete. The interstate consumption had not begun. Champlain Realty Co. v. Brattleboro
    Search
  13. and Carson Petroleum Co. v. Vial
    Search
  14. are therefore inapplicable. Bacon v. Illinois
    Search
  15. Cooney v. Mountain
    Search
  16. character would render the Cooney case inapplicable. For this point, we are referred to Puget Sound Co. v. Tax
    Search
  17. and Ozark Pipe Line Corp. v. Monier
    Search
  18. Southern Pac. Co. v. Corbett
    Search
  19. U. S. 300 U.S. 577. Cf. Felt & Tarrant Mfg. Co. v. Gallagher
    Search
  20. New York v. Kleinert
    Search
  21. Henneford v. Silas
    Search
  22. National Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Pacific
    Search
  23. Cf. Ozark Pipe Line Corp. v. Monier
    Search
  24. Telegraph Co. v. Texas
    Search
  25. Robbins v. Shelby
    Search
  26. Leloup v. Port
    Search
  27. See the discussion in Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. Henneford
    Search
  28. Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  29. Fisher's Blend Station v. Tax
    Search
  30. Adams Mfg. Co. v. Storen
    Search
  31. For comparison with sovereign immunity rule and reason for variation, see James v. Dravo
    Search
  32. Western Life Stock v. Bureau
    Search
  33. of Revenue, 303 U. S. 250 , 303 U. S. 256 , and cases cited. Coverdale v. Arkansas-Louisiana
    Search
  34. Ficklen v. Shelby
    Search
  35. Louis, 250 U. S. 459 , as explained in Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. Henneford
    Search
  36. supra, and Adams Mfg. Co. v. Storen
    Search
  37. Helson & Randolph v. Kentucky
    Search
  38. Bingaman v. Golden
    Search
  39. Coverdale v. Pipe
    Search
  40. Nashville, C. & St.L. Ry. Co. v. Wallace
    Search
  41. Edelman v. Boeing
    Search
  42. Gregg Dyeing Co. v. Query
    Search
  43. Utah Power & L. Co. v. Pfost
    Search
  44. Western Live Stock v. Bureau
    Search
  45. Cf. Henneford v. Silas
    Search
  46. taken place within the state on the principle that such acts are an essential part of interstate commerce. See Currin v. Wallace
    Search
  47. ante, p. 306 U. S. 1 . Cf. Townsend v. Yeomans
    Search
  48. Anglo-Chilean Corp. v. Alabama
    Search
  49. Virginia v. Imperial
    Search
  50. Southern Natural Gas Corp. v. Alabama
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial