Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bowen Vs. Johnston

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 30, 1939

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

40 entries 14 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Harlan Vs. Mcgourin US Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1910
  2. Mcmicking Vs. Schields US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1915
  3. Riddle Vs. Dyche US Supreme Court · May 21, 1923
  4. Craig Vs. Hecht US Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1923
  5. Glasgow Vs. Moyer US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1912
  6. Knewel Vs. Egan US Supreme Court · May 25, 1925
  7. Moore Vs. Dempsey US Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1923
  8. Johnson Vs. Zerbst US Supreme Court · May 23, 1938
  9. United States Vs. Soldana US Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1918
  10. Pothier Vs. Rodman US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1923
  11. Rodman Vs. Pothier US Supreme Court · Apr 07, 1924
  12. Henry Vs. Henkel US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1914
  13. Owings Vs. Hull US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1835
  14. Toy Toy Vs. Hopkins US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1909
  15. U.S. 19 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court Bowen v. Johnston
    Search
  16. U.S. 19 (1939) Bowen v. Johnston
    Search
  17. submitted and later was denied Page 306 U. S. 22 without opinion. On appeal, the order was affirmed. Bowen v. Johnson
    Search
  18. The court, taking the view that the United States could constitutionally acquire jurisdiction over the Park ( Collins v. Yosemite
    Search
  19. crimes there committed, depended upon the terms of the consent or cession given by the legislature of Georgia. Collins v. Yosemite
    Search
  20. Park Co., supra, pp. 304 U. S. 529 . See also James v. Dravo
    Search
  21. U. S. 134 , 302 U. S. 146 -148. The federal courts take judicial notice of the Georgia statutes. Owings v. Hull
    Search
  22. on demurrer to the indictment, the case may fall within the provisions of the Criminal Appeals Act. United States v. Sutton
    Search
  23. of the jurisdiction of the District Court in that aspect and that of the jurisdiction of the United States. Louie v. United
    Search
  24. judgment was held to be reviewable by the Circuit Court of Appeals, and not directly by this Court. See also Pronovost v. United
    Search
  25. by the Circuit Court of Appeals in error proceedings, and that the writ of habeas corpus is properly refused. Toy Toy v. Hopkins
    Search
  26. U. S. 399 , 264 U. S. 402 . See also Henry v. Henkel
    Search
  27. U. S. 219 , 235 U. S. 229 . On the same principle, in Walsh v. Archer
    Search
  28. power. It has special application where there are essential questions of fact determinable by the trial court. Rodman v. Pothier
    Search
  29. doubt that jurisdiction to punish for crimes committed on the lands within the Park remained with the State. See James v. Dravo
    Search
  30. U.S. Supreme Court Bowen v. Johnston
    Search
  31. Bowen v. Johnson
    Search
  32. Collins v. Yosemite
    Search
  33. of Georgia. Collins v. Yosemite
    Search
  34. James v. Dravo
    Search
  35. of the Criminal Appeals Act. United States v. Sutton
    Search
  36. of the United States. Louie v. United
    Search
  37. Pronovost v. United
    Search
  38. Walsh v. Archer
    Search
  39. the State. See James v. Dravo
    Search
  40. Lamar v. Micou
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial