Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

interstate Circuit, Inc. Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 13, 1939

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

62 entries 7 linked 55 unlinked
Show
  1. Kirby Vs. Tallmadge US Supreme Court · Jan 06, 1896
  2. United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer Vs. Commissioner US Supreme Court · Jan 03, 1927
  3. Lawlor Vs. Loewe US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1915
  4. Duplex Printing Press Co. Vs. Deering US Supreme Court · Jan 03, 1921
  5. Manners Vs. Morosco US Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1920
  6. Fowle Vs. Park US Supreme Court · May 13, 1889
  7. Runkle Vs. Burnham US Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1894
  8. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United
    Search
  9. States - 306 U.S. 208 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United
    Search
  10. States, 306 U.S. 208 (1939) Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United
    Search
  11. if the distributors agreed among themselves to impose the restrictions upon subsequent-run exhibitors. Straus v. American
    Search
  12. Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. United
    Search
  13. evidence when strong is available can lead only to the conclusion that the strong would have been adverse. Clifton v. United
    Search
  14. States, 4 How. 242, 45 U. S. 247 . Silence then becomes evidence of the most convincing character. Runkle v. Burnham
    Search
  15. Bilokumsky v. Tod
    Search
  16. Mammoth Oil Co. v. United
    Search
  17. Local 167 v. United
    Search
  18. may be and often is formed without simultaneous action or agreement on the part of the conspirators. United States v. Schenck
    Search
  19. Levey v. United
    Search
  20. is sufficient to establish an unlawful conspiracy under the Sherman Act. Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Assn. v. United
    Search
  21. American Column & Lumber Co. v. United
    Search
  22. United States v. American
    Search
  23. and to grant an exclusive or restrictive license to others to exhibit it. Page 306 U. S. 228 See Manners v. Morosco
    Search
  24. to manufacture and sell the patented article may fix the price at which the licensee may sell it. E. Bement & Sons v. National
    Search
  25. United States v. General
    Search
  26. an entertainment which includes features other than the particular picture licensed. Cf. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal
    Search
  27. Carbice Corp. v. American
    Search
  28. Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber
    Search
  29. from the competition, can no more be valid than a like agreement between two copyright owners or patentees. Straus v. American
    Search
  30. Standard Oil Co. v. United
    Search
  31. by making the copyright subservient to the contract does not relieve it of illegality. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. United
    Search
  32. the public. The benefit at such a cost does not justify the restraint. Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Assn. v. United
    Search
  33. Anderson v. Shipowners'
    Search
  34. Bedford Cut Stone Co. v. Journeyman
    Search
  35. It does not appear that the competition at which they were aimed was unfair or abnormal. Cf. Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. United
    Search
  36. agreements, which have been held to be unreasonable restraints in violation of the Sherman Act. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John
    Search
  37. Schrader's Son, Inc., 252 U. S. 85 . Cf. United States v. Trenton
    Search
  38. Together with No. 270, Paramount Pictures Distributing Co. et al. v. United
    Search
  39. Straus v. American
    Search
  40. See United States v. Dubilier
    Search
  41. Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. United
    Search
  42. States, 288 U. S. 344 , 288 U. S. 358 -362. Compare Chicago Board of Trade v. United
    Search
  43. E. Bement & Sons v. National
    Search
  44. Standard Oil Co. v. United
    Search
  45. Cincinnati Packet Co. v. Bay
    Search
  46. Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. Winsor
    Search
  47. Board of Trade v. Christie
    Search
  48. Moore v. New
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United
    Search
  50. Clifton v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial