Citation network
Texas Vs. Florida
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 13, 1939
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 398 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
make it incumbent upon us to inquire of our own motion whether the case is one within its jurisdiction. Minnesota v. HitchcockSearch
-
the determination of the case or controversy between the states are properly made parties defendant. Cf. United States v. WestSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
jurisprudence, which are guides to decision of cases within the original jurisdiction of this Court. See Robinson v. CampbellSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. WheelingSearch
-
the risk of loss ensuing from the demands in separate suits of rival claimants to the same debt or legal duty. Alnete v. BettamSearch
-
Hackett v. WebbSearch
-
is enough if he shows that conflicting claims are asserted and that the consequent risk of loss is substantial. Evans v. WrightSearch
-
Michigan Trust Co. v. McNamaraSearch
-
Webster v. HallSearch
-
Thomson v. EbbetsSearch
-
Dorn v. FoxSearch
-
Yarborough v. ThompsonSearch
-
equitable relief is the danger of injury because of the risk of multiple suits when the liability is single, Farley v. BloodSearch
-
Bedell v. HoffmanSearch
-
Mohawk & Hudson R. Co. v. CluteSearch
-
Atkinson v. ManksSearch
-
parties other than the single claim determination of which is decisive of the rights of all. Pacific National Bank v. MixterSearch
-
Provident Sav. Life Assur. Soc. v. LoebSearch
-
Sherman National Bank v. ShubertSearch
-
Illingworth v. RoweSearch
-
Carter v. CryerSearch
-
within the original jurisdiction of this Court conferred by the Judiciary Article. See Nashville, C. & St.L. Ry. Co. v. WallaceSearch
-
s intangibles differing, for tax purposes, from the place of his domicile, such as was considered in New Orleans v. StempelSearch
-
Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Maryland v. VirginiaSearch
-
Beidler v. SouthSearch
-
First National Bank v. MaineSearch
-
Long v. StokesSearch
-
but to which the other states are not parties, is an established principle of our federal jurisprudence. Thormann v. FrameSearch
-
Baker v. BakerSearch
-
to it and constitutionally entitled to full faith and credit in the courts of every other state. Milwaukee County v. WhiteSearch
-
circumstances as they are in good faith alleged and shown to exist at the time when the suit was brought. Cf. Clark v. WoosterSearch
-
Rice & Adams v. LathropSearch
-
accepted and favorably acted upon if there were no participation by the other states in the litigation. See New Jersey v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Hill v. MartinSearch
-
Dorrance v. Thayer-MartinSearch
-
T his has long been the settled practice of this Court in cases of boundary disputes between states. Louisiana v. MississippiSearch
-
Arkansas v. TennesseeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial