Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mulford Vs. Smith

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 17, 1939

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

54 entries 6 linked 48 unlinked
Show
  1. CurrIn Vs. Wallace US Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1939
  2. United States Vs. Grimaud US Supreme Court · May 03, 1911
  3. Wilson Vs. New US Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1917
    Relied / Followed
  4. Hammer Vs. Dagenhart US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1918
  5. Townsend Vs. Yeomans US Supreme Court · May 24, 1937
  6. United States Vs. Butler US Supreme Court · Jan 06, 1936
  7. U.S. 38 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court Mulford v. Smith
    Search
  8. U.S. 38 (1939) Mulford v. Smith
    Search
  9. Townsend v. Yeomans
    Search
  10. Dahnke-Walker Co. v. Bondurant
    Search
  11. Shafer v. Farmers
    Search
  12. Grain Co., 268 U. S. 189 , 268 U. S. 198 . Compare Lemke v. Farmers
    Search
  13. Champion v. Ames
    Search
  14. Hipolite Egg Co. v. United
    Search
  15. Hoke v. United
    Search
  16. Brooks v. United
    Search
  17. Gooch v. United
    Search
  18. Avent v. United
    Search
  19. Hampton & Co. v. United
    Search
  20. New York Central Securities Corp. v. United
    Search
  21. of the market value of all tobacco raised and sold by them in excess of the prescribed quotas. In United States v. Butler
    Search
  22. for selling is the exact equivalent of punishment for raising the tobacco. The Act is therefore invalid. United States v. Butler
    Search
  23. U. S. 1 . Hammer v. Dagenhart
    Search
  24. U. S. 251 . See Brooks v. United
    Search
  25. Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. v. Illinois
    Search
  26. Central R. Co., 299 U. S. 334 , 299 U. S. 350 . Cf. Retirement Board v. Alton
    Search
  27. R. Co., 295 U. S. 330 , 295 U. S. 362 , et seq. Assuming that, under Currin v. Wallace
    Search
  28. The Lottery Case (Champion v. Ames
    Search
  29. and authorizing articles so transported to be seized as contraband. Hoke v. United
    Search
  30. S. 308 , sustained congressional prohibition of interstate transportation of women for immoral purposes. Brooks v. United
    Search
  31. a statute of the United States making it a crime to transport a stolen automobile in interstate commerce. Gooch v. United
    Search
  32. Lottery Case, 188 U. S. 321 , 188 U. S. 355 et seq. United States v. Delaware
    Search
  33. Hudson Co., 213 U. S. 366 , 213 U. S. 415 . Hipolite Egg Co. v. United
    Search
  34. States, 220 U. S. 45 , 220 U. S. 57 -58. Hoke v. United
    Search
  35. States, 227 U. S. 308 , 227 U. S. 321 -323. Seven Cases v. United
    Search
  36. States, 239 U. S. 510 , 239 U. S. 514 . Caminetti v. United
    Search
  37. States, 242 U. S. 470 , 242 U. S. 491 -492. Hammer v. Dagenhart
    Search
  38. U. S. 251 , 247 U. S. 270 et seq. Brooks v. United
    Search
  39. States, 267 U. S. 432 , 267 U. S. 436 -438. See Wilson v. New
    Search
  40. U. S. 332 , 243 U. S. 346 . Cf. Clark Distilling Co. v. Western
    Search
  41. Md. Ry. Co., 242 U. S. 311 , 242 U. S. 325 . United States v. Hill
    Search
  42. U. S. 420 . Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. v. Illinois
    Search
  43. U.S. Supreme Court Mulford v. Smith
    Search
  44. Dahnke-Walker Co. v. Bondurant
    Search
  45. Compare Lemke v. Farmers
    Search
  46. In United States v. Butler
    Search
  47. See Brooks v. United
    Search
  48. Cf. Retirement Board v. Alton
    Search
  49. United States v. Delaware
    Search
  50. Seven Cases v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial