Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Morgan

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 15, 1939

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

55 entries 5 linked 50 unlinked
Show
  1. Weeks Vs. Bridgman US Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1895
  2. Toy Toy Vs. Hopkins US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1909
  3. Deweese Vs. Reinhard US Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1897
  4. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1935
  5. Northwestern Fuel Co. Vs. Brock US Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1891
  6. U.S. 183 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Morgan
    Search
  7. U.S. 183 (1939) United States v. Morgan
    Search
  8. of the order of the Secretary of Agriculture which this Court held invalid for want of due procedure in Morgan v. United
    Search
  9. scheduled rates and those prescribed by the Secretary's order, which was ultimately set aside by this Court in Morgan v. United
    Search
  10. of the Act requires, and, without considering the merits, it remanded the cause for further proceedings. Morgan v. United
    Search
  11. remand, the Secretary was left free to take such further proceedings as the statute permits. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  12. Florida v. United
    Search
  13. with the provisions of the Urgent Deficiencies Act, the district court sits as a court of equity, see Ford Motor Co. v. Labor
    Search
  14. Inland Steel Co. v. United
    Search
  15. to determine a reasonable rate for the period antedating any order he may now make. See Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Florida
    Search
  16. No prior decision of the Secretary stands in the way of his making the determination now. Cf. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison
    Search
  17. and the public, whose interests the injunction and the final disposition of the fund affect. Inland Steel Co. v. United
    Search
  18. and the manner of moulding its remedies, may be affected by the public interest involved. Central Kentucky Gas Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  19. Pennsylvania v. Williams
    Search
  20. Virginia Ry. Co. v. Federation
    Search
  21. would seem evident notwithstanding the absence of any order of the Secretary directing the payment. Inland Steel Co. v. United
    Search
  22. in the present circumstances it might otherwise afford. This Court went much further in Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Florida
    Search
  23. without the sanction of a valid order. But there, as here, the first administrative order was not a nullity. Ewell v. Daggs
    Search
  24. the subsequent determination of the administrative agency as the basis of its action. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Florida
    Search
  25. New York Edison Co. v. Maltbie
    Search
  26. Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Maltbie
    Search
  27. was free to refrain from compelling restitution if satisfied that no injustice had been done, See Tiffany v. Boatman's
    Search
  28. Mississippi & M. R. Co. v. Cromwell
    Search
  29. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 249 U. S. 134 , 249 U. S. 146 . See Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Brock
    Search
  30. the court will restore when its judgment has been set aside and justice requires restitution. Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Brock
    Search
  31. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United
    Search
  32. the fund in the meantime, and ultimately distributing it to those found to be entitled to it. See New York Edison Co. v. Maltbie
    Search
  33. United States v. Klein
    Search
  34. basis for action in the district court in making distribution of the fund in its custody. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Florida
    Search
  35. proceeding with due expedition, shall have entered a final order in the proceedings pending before him. Cf. Mabler v. Eby
    Search
  36. Heath v. Rydley
    Search
  37. In Inland Steel Co. v. United
    Search
  38. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison
    Search
  39. if one shall be made. The challenged order having been adjudged invalid because made in violation of the Act, Morgan v. United
    Search
  40. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Morgan
    Search
  41. Morgan v. United
    Search
  42. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  43. Ford Motor Co. v. Labor
    Search
  44. See Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Florida
    Search
  45. Cf. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison
    Search
  46. Central Kentucky Gas Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  47. Ewell v. Daggs
    Search
  48. See Tiffany v. Boatman's
    Search
  49. See Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Brock
    Search
  50. See New York Edison Co. v. Maltbie
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial