Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

O'Malley Vs. Woodrough

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 22, 1939

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

57 entries 3 linked 54 unlinked
Show
  1. Evans Vs. Gore US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1920
  2. Gillespie Vs. Oklahoma US Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1922
  3. Miles Vs. Graham US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1925
  4. U.S. 277 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court O'Malley v. Woodrough
    Search
  5. U.S. 277 (1939) O'Malley v. Woodrough
    Search
  6. of the Revenue Act of 1932, Congress sought to avoid, at least in part, the consequences of Evans v. Gore
    Search
  7. See also the separate opinion of Mr. Justice Field in Pollock v. Farmers'
    Search
  8. Page 307 U. S. 281 acted upon this construction of the Constitution. However, the meaning which Evans v. Gore
    Search
  9. to the extent Page 307 U. S. 283 that what the Court now says is inconsistent with what was said in Miles v. Graham
    Search
  10. See Mr. Justice Field, concurring, in Pollock v. Farmers'
    Search
  11. See Wayne v. United
    Search
  12. See Judgments in Cooper v. Commissioner
    Search
  13. Judges v. Attorney
    Search
  14. con are collected in the recent dissenting opinion by Chief Judge Bond of the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Gordy v. Dennis
    Search
  15. A.2d 69, 82. Particular attention should be called to the decision of the Supreme Court of South Africa, Krause v. Commissioner
    Search
  16. construction of the clause was by the circuit court of the District of Columbia in 1803, in the case of United States v. More
    Search
  17. channels, others through action of the court of claims and ensuing appropriations by Congress. See Wayne v. United
    Search
  18. and assigned that ground, among others, for joining in the decision that the Act was unconstitutional. Pollock v. Farmers'
    Search
  19. The question was raised and presented for decision in Evans v. Gore
    Search
  20. Mr. Justice Brandeis joined. With that expression, his opposition to the decision ended. Two years later, in Gillespie v. Oklahoma
    Search
  21. which net income is derived, and, if a part of it comes from such a source, the tax is pro tanto void, Pollock v. Farmers'
    Search
  22. a rule lately illustrated by Evans v. Gore
    Search
  23. And, in that case, he relied on the truth, as put by Chief Justice Marshall in M'Culloch v. Maryland
    Search
  24. He quoted (p. 257 U. S. 505 ) with approval from Indian Oil Co. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  25. Page 307 U. S. 295 Miles v. Graham
    Search
  26. a), Revenue Act of 1918, (condemned in Evans v. Gore
    Search
  27. per annum, and to exact a tax in respect of this would diminish it within the plain rule of Evans v. Gore
    Search
  28. In O'Donoghue v. United
    Search
  29. the authorities, adopted the reasoning, and reaffirmed the conclusions on which rest the Court's judgments in Evans v. Gore
    Search
  30. supra, and Miles v. Graham
    Search
  31. supra. And see Booth v. United
    Search
  32. States, 291 U. S. 339 . Evidently the Court intends to destroy the decision in Evans v. Gore
    Search
  33. supra. Without suggesting that there is any distinction between that case and Miles v. Graham
    Search
  34. speaking judges in foreign countries. It refers, footnote 6 to the decision of the Privy Council in Judges v. Attorney
    Search
  35. from any state court decision. The one it cites, footnote 8 that of the Maryland Court of Appeals in Gordy v. Dennis
    Search
  36. is one of the decisions subjected to condemnatory comment in the concurring opinion in Graves v. New
    Search
  37. is announced after a reconstruction in the membership of the Court. . . . The arguments upon which M'Culloch v. Maryland
    Search
  38. unrelated to affairs. These refinements derived authority from an unfortunate remark in the opinion in M'Culloch v. Maryland
    Search
  39. The power to tax is not the power to destroy while this Court sits.' Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi
    Search
  40. McCray v. United
    Search
  41. Magnano Co. v. Hamilton
    Search
  42. Cincinnati Soap Co. v. United
    Search
  43. U.S. Supreme Court O'Malley v. Woodrough
    Search
  44. of Evans v. Gore
    Search
  45. Pollock v. Farmers'
    Search
  46. Cooper v. Commissioner
    Search
  47. Judges v. Attorney
    Search
  48. Gordy v. Dennis
    Search
  49. of the Supreme Court of South Africa, Krause v. Commissioner
    Search
  50. of United States v. More
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial