Citation network
Lane Vs. Wilson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 22, 1939
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 268 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
U.S. 268 (1939) Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
which this Court in 1915 adjudged unconstitutional, Guinn v. UnitedSearch
-
granted, 305 U.S. 591, because of the importance of the question and an asserted conflict with the decision in Guinn v. UnitedSearch
-
was obviously Page 307 U. S. 271 directed towards the consequences of the decision in Guinn v. UnitedSearch
-
immunity prior to Guinn v. UnitedSearch
-
a constitutional question must be reserved to the last. The first objection derives from a misapplication of Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
from this traditional restriction upon the exercise of equitable jurisdiction, there was another difficulty in Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
This case is very different from Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
the difference having been explicitly foreshadowed by Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
of this action is inequality of treatment, though under color of law, not denial of the right to vote. Compare Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
powers conferred on state courts, must be completed before resort to the federal courts can be had. Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Oklahoma Cotton Ginners' Assn. v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
P.2d 327. Barring only exceptional circumstances, see e.g., Gilchrist v. InterboroughSearch
-
resort to a federal court may be had without first exhausting the judicial remedies of state courts. Bacon v. RutlandSearch
-
Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. KuykenallSearch
-
vote by citizens of the United States regardless of race or color has been amply expounded by prior decisions. Guinn v. UnitedSearch
-
franchise by the colored race although the abstract right to vote may remain unrestricted as to race. When, in Guinn v. UnitedSearch
-
Walton v. HouseSearch
-
S. 487 . Recognition of the difference between an action for damages and the equitable relief prayed for in Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
were of the opinion that it was competent for a federal court to grant even the equitable relief asked for in Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
Guinn v. UnitedSearch
-
of Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
Compare Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Gilchrist v. InterboroughSearch
-
Bacon v. RutlandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial