Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Treinies Vs. Sunshine Mining Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 06, 1939

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

52 entries 12 linked 40 unlinked
Show
  1. Strawbridge Vs. Curtiss US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1806
  2. Camp Vs. Gress US Supreme Court · Jun 02, 1919
  3. Barney Vs. Latham US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  4. Worcester County Trust Co. Vs. Riley US Supreme Court · Dec 06, 1937
  5. Smith Vs. Apple US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1924
  6. Thompson Vs. Whitman US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  7. Adam Vs. Saenger US Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1938
  8. Chicago Life Ins. Co. Vs. Cherry US Supreme Court · May 07, 1917
  9. Stoll Vs. Gottlieb US Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1938
  10. Roche Vs. Mcdonald US Supreme Court · Jan 03, 1928
  11. American Surety Co. Vs. Baldwin US Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1932
  12. Pullman Co. Vs. Jenkins US Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1939
  13. Treinies v. Sunshine
    Search
  14. Mining Co. - 308 U.S. 66 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court Treinies v. Sunshine
    Search
  15. Mining Co., 308 U.S. 66 (1939) Treinies v. Sunshine
    Search
  16. We so held as to a stakeholder in Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers'
    Search
  17. on the ground that the only obligation of the stakeholder was to pay over the money deposited with it. In Cramer v. Phoenix
    Search
  18. Pelkes v. Mason
    Search
  19. Mansfield, C. & L.M. Ry. Co. v. Swan
    Search
  20. a multiplicity of suits from diverse claimants with claims contested by the debtor is not involved. Cf. Di Giovanni v. Camden
    Search
  21. Sanders v. Armour
    Search
  22. Pullman Co. v. Jenkins
    Search
  23. F.2d 141, 146. See also Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Lott
    Search
  24. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Cross
    Search
  25. Eagle, Star & British Dominions v. Tadlock
    Search
  26. F.Supp. 933, reversed, Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Walsh
    Search
  27. Ackerman v. Tobin
    Search
  28. jurisdiction was rested on diversity of citizenship between the applicant and co-citizens who are claimants. ( Mallers v. Equitable
    Search
  29. Security Trust & Savings Bank of San Diego v. Walsh
    Search
  30. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Meguire
    Search
  31. Turman Oil Co. v. Lathrop
    Search
  32. Dugas v. American
    Search
  33. of the jurisdiction of the court of a sister state is a matter within the control of the respective states ( Adam v. Saenger
    Search
  34. state, and that, without allegation and evidence, it will be assumed the laws are the same as those of Idaho. Maloney v. Winston
    Search
  35. Douglas v. Douglas
    Search
  36. Mechanics & Metals Nat. Bk. v. Pingree
    Search
  37. State v. Martinez
    Search
  38. Kleinschmidt v. Scribner
    Search
  39. P.2d 362. While none of these cases involved a stipulation, the decision of the Supreme Court of Idaho ( Mason v. Pelkes
    Search
  40. Old Wayne Life Assn. v. McDonough
    Search
  41. Baldwin v. Traveling
    Search
  42. U.S. Supreme Court Treinies v. Sunshine
    Search
  43. Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers'
    Search
  44. In Cramer v. Phoenix
    Search
  45. Cf. Di Giovanni v. Camden
    Search
  46. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Lott
    Search
  47. Eagle, Star & British Dominions v. Tadlock
    Search
  48. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Walsh
    Search
  49. Mallers v. Equitable
    Search
  50. of Idaho. Maloney v. Winston
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial