Citation network
Pepper Vs. Litton
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 04, 1939
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 295 (1939) U.S. Supreme Court Pepper v. LittonSearch
-
U.S. 295 (1939) Pepper v. LittonSearch
-
since Pepper was estopped, so was the trustee. On appeal, that judgment was affirmed on those grounds. Smith v. LittonSearch
-
of the jurisdiction conferred upon it by the act, it applies the principles and rules of equity jurisprudence. Larson v. FirstSearch
-
the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court is exclusive of all other courts. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BraySearch
-
any claim asserted against the estate, and to disallow it if it is ascertained to be without lawful existence. Lesser v. GraySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
As the merger of a claim into a judgment does not change its nature so far as provability is concerned, Boynton v. BallSearch
-
the essential nature of the liability Page 308 U. S. 306 for purposes of proof and allowance. Wetmore v. MarkoeSearch
-
It may ascertain the validity of liens, marshal them, and control their enforcement and liquidation. Isaacs v. HobbsSearch
-
be necessitated by certain cardinal principles of equity jurisprudence. A director is a fiduciary. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySearch
-
U. S. 588 . So is a dominant or controlling stockholder or group of stockholders. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSearch
-
U. S. 483 , 250 U. S. 492 . Their powers are powers in trust. See Jackson v. LudelingSearch
-
but also to show its inherent fairness from the viewpoint of the corporation and those interested therein. Geddes v. AnacondaSearch
-
stockholder. That is clearly the power and duty of the bankruptcy courts under the reorganization sections. In Taylor v. StandardSearch
-
be taken as an isolated step unconnected with the long antecedent events, all designed to defeat creditors. Buffum v. PeterSearch
-
Plaintiff, however, did appeal on certain phases of the case. See Pepper v. DixieSearch
-
after adjudication and discharge of the bankrupt, from prosecuting his claim in a state court. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSearch
-
Cross v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Dearborn Electric Light & Power Co. v. JonesSearch
-
jurisdiction has power to permit claims to be proved thereafter in order to prevent a fraud or an injustice. Williams v. RiceSearch
-
Larson v. FirstSearch
-
Burton Coal Co. v. FranklinSearch
-
Chandler v. ThompsonSearch
-
This Court said, in Twin-Lick Oil Company v. MarburySearch
-
Converse v. UnitedSearch
-
Shoe Machinery Co., 209 Mass. 539, 95 N.E. 929. Davenport v. DowsSearch
-
that breach of that fiduciary duty may also give rise to direct actions by stockholders in their own right. Strong v. RepideSearch
-
U. S. 419 . Cf. Green v. VictorSearch
-
Manning v. CampbellSearch
-
Stephan v. Merchants'Search
-
Dean v. ShingleSearch
-
See Wyman v. BowmanSearch
-
Burnes v. BurnesSearch
-
Texas Auto Co. v. ArbetterSearch
-
Thus, in National Cash Register Co. v. DallenSearch
-
Forbush Co. v. BartleySearch
-
Clere Clothing Co. v. UnionSearch
-
Albert Richards Co., Inc. v. TheSearch
-
Mayfair, Inc., 287 Mass. 280, 191 N.E. 430. Cf. Erickson v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Oriental Investment Co. v. BarclaySearch
-
Joseph R. Foard Co. v. MarylandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial