Citation network
Adam Vs. Saenger
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 31, 1938
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 59 (1938) U.S. Supreme Court Adam v. SaengerSearch
-
U.S. 59 (1938) Adam v. SaengerSearch
-
Supreme Court for a writ of error was denied for want of jurisdiction. We granted certiorari, cf. Bain Peanut Co. v. PinsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to the Texas Court of Civil Appeals, it being the highest court of the state in which a judgment could be had. Bacon v. TexasSearch
-
San Antonio & A.P. Ry. Co. v. WagnerSearch
-
beyond the protection of the full faith and credit clause. To review these rulings, we brought the case here. Cf. Ward v. LoveSearch
-
the cause and the parties is to be presumed unless disproved by extrinsic evidence, or by the record itself. Hanley v. DonoghueSearch
-
Knowles v. LogansportSearch
-
another state, the jurisdiction of the court which rendered it is open to judicial inquiry, Chicago Life Insurance Co. v. CherrySearch
-
not litigated in the original suit, it is a matter to be adjudicated in the suit founded upon the judgment. Thompson v. WhitmanSearch
-
alleged will be considered in determining whether the law of another state differs from that of Texas. Porcheler v. BronsonSearch
-
Gill v. EvermanSearch
-
National Bank of Commerce v. KenneySearch
-
statute, the decision of the Texas court on that point, whether of law or of fact, is reviewable here. Stanley v. SchwalbySearch
-
Creswill v. KnightsSearch
-
Ancient Egyptian Order v. MichauxSearch
-
Northern Pacific R. Co. v. NorthSearch
-
Union Pacific R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Ward v. LoveSearch
-
Patterson v. AlabamaSearch
-
of the local courts, but upon the law of another state, as readily determined here as in a state court. Huntington v. AttrillSearch
-
independent suit in which a final judgment could be rendered without awaiting a decision in the original suit. Farar v. SteenberghSearch
-
the attitude of an independent suit, and requires service of the cross-action upon the cross-defendant. Harris v. SchlinkeSearch
-
hold that a cross-complaint may be served on the attorney of one who is already a party to the original action. Farrar v. SteenberghSearch
-
Wood v. JohnstonSearch
-
Ritter v. BraashSearch
-
on the attorney has been definitely answered in the negative by the Supreme Court of California, which, in Farrar v. SteenberghSearch
-
taken upon default in a cross-action begun by service of the cross-complaint on the plaintiff's attorney. Ritter v. BraashSearch
-
It is the price which the state may exact as the condition of opening its courts to the plaintiff. Young Company v. McNeal-EdwardsSearch
-
Chicago & N.W. Ry. Co. v. LindellSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Adam v. SaengerSearch
-
Bacon v. TexasSearch
-
Cf. Ward v. LoveSearch
-
Anderson v. BrandSearch
-
Chicago Life Insurance Co. v. CherrySearch
-
Thompson v. WhitmanSearch
-
of Texas. Porcheler v. BronsonSearch
-
Northern Pacific R. Co. v. NorthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial