Citation network
United States Vs. Griffin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 28, 1938
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 226 (1938) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. GriffinSearch
-
U.S. 226 (1938) United States v. GriffinSearch
-
we conclude that the District Court lacked jurisdiction of the cause, direct that the bill be dismissed. United States v. CorrickSearch
-
orders. Procter & Gamble Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
that rule has been consistently followed in cases brought under the Urgent Deficiencies Act. Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Piedmont & Northern Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 435 . Compare Delaware & Hudson Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LosSearch
-
In Great Northern Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the Government's guaranty of income for the period following relinquishment of federal control. And in United States v. LosSearch
-
of an action for the balance, as the claim asserted is one founded upon a law of Congress. Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 271 U. S. 603 . Compare United States v. NewSearch
-
Stat. 505, have jurisdiction also of an action for additional compensation if an order is confiscatory. United States v. GreatSearch
-
North American Transportation & Trading Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Jacobs v. UnitedSearch
-
if the Commission is alleged to have acted in excess of its authority or otherwise illegally. Compare Powell v. UnitedSearch
-
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
but under contracts voluntarily entered into with the Postmaster General. New York New Haven & Hartford R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. IllinoisSearch
-
Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare United States v. IllinoisSearch
-
Delaware & Hudson Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. AtlantaSearch
-
Chicago & E.I. Ry. v. UnitedSearch
-
Nevada County N.G. R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Chicago & E.I. Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Macon, D. & S. R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Ct.Cls. 298. Compare Pere Marquette Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
New Jersey & N.Y. R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Lambert Run Coal Co. v. BaltimoreSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. GriffinSearch
-
Procter & Gamble Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the Urgent Deficiencies Act. Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Delaware & Hudson Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
of Congress. Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare United States v. NewSearch
-
United States v. GreatSearch
-
Compare Powell v. UnitedSearch
-
the Postmaster General. New York New Haven & Hartford R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Pere Marquette Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial