Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Helvering Vs. MountaIn Producers Corp.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 07, 1938

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

75 entries 9 linked 66 unlinked
Show
  1. Willcuts Vs. Bunn US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1931
  2. Railroad Company Vs. Peniston US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  3. Alward Vs. Johnson US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1931
  4. Snyder Vs. Bettman US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1903
  5. Helvering Vs. therrell US Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1938
  6. Gillespie Vs. Oklahoma US Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1922
  7. United States Vs. Ludey US Supreme Court · May 16, 1927
  8. Jaybird Mining Co Vs. Weir US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1926
  9. Helvering v. Mountain
    Search
  10. Producers Corp. - 303 U.S. 376 (1938) U.S. Supreme Court Helvering v. Mountain
    Search
  11. Producers Corp., 303 U.S. 376 (1938) Helvering v. Mountain
    Search
  12. with the execution of the trust assumed by the State under the Enabling Act. Pp. 303 U. S. 383 -387. Burnet v. Coronado
    Search
  13. Oil & Gas Co., 285 U. S. 393 , and Gillespie v. Oklahoma
    Search
  14. conflict with a decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the case of Bankline Oil Company v. Commissioner
    Search
  15. F.2d 899 ( see Helvering v. Bankline
    Search
  16. be compensation to the owner for the exhaustion of the mineral deposits in the course of production. United States v. Ludey
    Search
  17. the taxpayer was permitted to deduct a specified percentage of his gross income from the property. See United States v. Dakota-Montana
    Search
  18. Helvering v. Twin
    Search
  19. means gross income from the oil and gas ( Helvering v. Twin
    Search
  20. virtue of the declaration of trust, and not by the lessee, the case would fall directly within the decision in Burnet v. Coronado
    Search
  21. by the State of Oklahoma. In Burnet v. Jergins
    Search
  22. decisions as to the taxing power. The Coronado case was decided as a corollary to the case of Gillespie v. Oklahoma
    Search
  23. from sales of his share of oil and gas received under leases of restricted Indian lands. See Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. Harrison
    Search
  24. We have held that the ruling in the Gillespie case should be limited strictly to cases closely analogous (Burnet v. Coronado
    Search
  25. to a consulting engineer for work on public projects may be subjected to a federal income tax ( Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell
    Search
  26. and that the income of independent contractors engaged in carrying on government enterprises may be taxed. James v. Dravo
    Search
  27. property of such an agent, and used in the conduct of the agent's operations and necessary for the agency. McCulloch v. Maryland
    Search
  28. average amount of their deposits, although deposits of state funds by state officers are included. Manhattan Company v. Blake
    Search
  29. to the United States and to the taxation by the Congress of bequests to states or their municipalities. United States v. Perkins
    Search
  30. held to be invalid as a tax bearing directly upon the exercise of the borrowing power of the government ( Weston v. Charleston
    Search
  31. Pollock v. Farmers'
    Search
  32. the government in the bonds themselves, and the profits of such sales are subject to the federal income tax. Willcuts v. Bunn
    Search
  33. supra, p. 282 U. S. 227 . See also Burnet v. Jergins
    Search
  34. ante, p. 303 U. S. 218 , and Helvering v. Bankline
    Search
  35. Oil Co., ante, p. 303 U. S. 362 . In Group No. 1 Oil Corp. v. Bass
    Search
  36. of Texas, the leases effected a present sale to the lessee of the oil and gas in place. In Indian Territory Oil Co. v. Board
    Search
  37. that the effect upon the government is other than indirect and remote. We are convinced that the rulings in Gillespie v. Oklahoma
    Search
  38. supra, and Burnet v. Coronado
    Search
  39. in the consideration and decision of this case. MR. JUSTICE BUTLER, dissenting. At least since M'Culloch v. Maryland
    Search
  40. upon them. A few citations will be sufficient to suggest the character of the change so wrought. M'Culloch v. Maryland
    Search
  41. Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Minnesota
    Search
  42. carried to an extent that will entirely arrest governmental operations. The Court rested that decision upon M'Culloch v. Maryland
    Search
  43. Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. Harrison
    Search
  44. Page 303 U. S. 389 Indian Territory Oil Co. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  45. U. S. 501 , held that net income derived from leases like those considered in Choctaw, O. & G. R. v. Harrison
    Search
  46. supra, and Indian Territory Oil Co. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  47. Page 303 U. S. 390 Jaybird Mining Co. v. Weir
    Search
  48. In Burnet v. Coronado
    Search
  49. of its share of the oil received under the lease of state school lands, this Court expressly overrules Gillespie v. Oklahoma
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial