Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lovell Vs. City of Griffin

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 28, 1938

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

40 entries 5 linked 35 unlinked
Show
  1. First National Bank Vs. Anderson US Supreme Court · Jan 04, 1926
  2. Schuylkill Trust Co. Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1935
  3. Stromberg Vs. California US Supreme Court · May 18, 1931
  4. Near Vs. Minnesota US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1931
  5. Palko Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · Dec 06, 1937
    Relied / Followed
  6. Lovell v. City
    Search
  7. of Griffin - 303 U.S. 444 (1938) U.S. Supreme Court Lovell v. City
    Search
  8. of Griffin, 303 U.S. 444 (1938) Lovell v. City
    Search
  9. with respect to the same ordinance, was presented in the case of Coleman v. City
    Search
  10. Ga.App. 123, and the appeal was dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 302 U.S. 636. Reynolds v. United
    Search
  11. Davis Page 303 U. S. 450 v. Beason
    Search
  12. and was decided in the instant case. Whether it was so presented and was decided is itself a federal question. Carter v. Texas
    Search
  13. Ward v. Love
    Search
  14. personal rights and liberties which are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment from invasion by state action. Gitlow v. New
    Search
  15. Grosjean v. American
    Search
  16. De Jonge v. Oregon
    Search
  17. U. S. 353 , 299 U. S. 364 . See also Palko v. Connecticut
    Search
  18. adopted under state authority constitute state action, and are within the prohibition of the amendment. Raymond v. Chicago
    Search
  19. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Los
    Search
  20. Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Akron
    Search
  21. was a leading purpose in the adoption of the Page 303 U. S. 452 constitutional provision. See Patterson v. Colorado
    Search
  22. the vital importance of protecting this essential liberty from every sort of infringement need not be repeated. Near v. Minnesota
    Search
  23. Ex parte Jackson, 96 U. S. 727 , 96 U. S. 733 . The license tax in Grosjean v. American
    Search
  24. it. She was Page 303 U. S. 453 entitled to contest it validity in answer to the charge against her. Smith v. Cahoon
    Search
  25. Starr Company v. Brush
    Search
  26. Dearborn Publishing Co. v. Fitzgerald
    Search
  27. Coughlin v. Sullivan
    Search
  28. N.J.L. 42, 126 Atl. 177. Compare People v. Armstrong
    Search
  29. Chicago v. Schultz
    Search
  30. People v. Armentrout
    Search
  31. U.S. Supreme Court Lovell v. City
    Search
  32. of Coleman v. City
    Search
  33. Reynolds v. United
    Search
  34. Carter v. Texas
    Search
  35. Gitlow v. New
    Search
  36. Raymond v. Chicago
    Search
  37. See Patterson v. Colorado
    Search
  38. Smith v. Cahoon
    Search
  39. Starr Company v. Brush
    Search
  40. Compare People v. Armstrong
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales