Citation network
Electric Bond and Share Co. Vs. Sec
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 28, 1938
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Electric Bond & Share Co. v. SECSearch
-
U.S. 419 (1938) U.S. Supreme Court Electric Bond & Share Co. v. SECSearch
-
U.S. 419 (1938) Electric Bond & Share Co. v. SecuritiesSearch
-
be effective as an entirety or not at all. Congress has established the opposite presumption of divisibility. Williams v. StandardSearch
-
Utah Power & Light Co. v. PfostSearch
-
Champlin Refining Co. v. CorporationSearch
-
legislation, but through the continuous supervision of an administrative body. See Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSearch
-
Interstate Commerce Commission v. GoodrichSearch
-
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Lewis Publishing Co. v. MorganSearch
-
requirement of information is, in itself, a permissible and useful type of regulation ( Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSearch
-
to depend upon the mere modal arrangements of those seeking to escape its exercise. Compare Northern Securities Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
for the violation of its rules, Congress has a wide discretion. Sanctions may be of various types. See Helvering v. MitchellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
commerce, Congress may deny to those who violate the rule the right to engage in such transactions. Champion v. AmesSearch
-
United States v. DelawareSearch
-
Brooks v. UnitedSearch
-
Gooch v. UnitedSearch
-
Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
pertinent to the use of the mails, it may withdraw the privilege of that use from those who disobey. Champion v. AmesSearch
-
Declaratory Judgment Act in order to obtain an advisory decree upon a hypothetical state of facts. See New Jersey v. SargentSearch
-
United States v. WestSearch
-
Ashwander v. TennesseeSearch
-
Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSearch
-
not yet developed, cannot now be definitely perceived. We must decline that invitation. Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Electric Bond & Share Co. v. SECSearch
-
Electric Bond & Share Co. v. SecuritiesSearch
-
Williams v. StandardSearch
-
See Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSearch
-
Compare Northern Securities Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Helvering v. MitchellSearch
-
Champion v. AmesSearch
-
See New Jersey v. SargentSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial