Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Fpc Vs. Metropolitan Edison Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 23, 1938

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 1 linked 31 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Griffin US Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1938
  2. FPC v. Metropolitan
    Search
  3. Edison Co. - 304 U.S. 375 (1938) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. Metropolitan
    Search
  4. Edison Co., 304 U.S. 375 (1938) Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan
    Search
  5. See United States v. Los
    Search
  6. Angeles & Salt Lake R. Co., 273 U. S. 299 , 273 U. S. 309 , and cases cited. In United States v. Illinois
    Search
  7. it within the purview of the statute. It was a mere step in procedure. See also New York, Ontario & Western Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  8. F.2d 850, aff'd 273 U.S. 652. Negative orders of the Commission are not reviewable. Procter & Gamble Co. v. United
    Search
  9. Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. United
    Search
  10. of the Interstate Commerce Act, though called an order, is not reviewable. United States v. Los
    Search
  11. Angeles & Salt Lake R. Co., supra. Compare United States v. Atlanta
    Search
  12. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  13. Shannahan v. United
    Search
  14. orders are not within the statutes providing for review by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Chamber of Commerce v. Federal
    Search
  15. Ames Baldwin Wyoming Co. v. Labor
    Search
  16. Jones v. Securities
    Search
  17. remedy has been exhausted have been held to be at war with the long settled rule of judicial administration. Myers v. Bethlehem
    Search
  18. Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U. S. 41 . See also Securities and Exchange Comm'n v. Andrews
    Search
  19. In fixing a date for hearing, the Page 304 U. S. 386 order was nothing more than a notice. United States v. Illinois
    Search
  20. for the enforcement of its order, respondents would have full opportunity to contest its validity. See Jones v. Securities
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. Metropolitan
    Search
  22. Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan
    Search
  23. In United States v. Illinois
    Search
  24. New York, Ontario & Western Ry. Co. v. United
    Search
  25. Procter & Gamble Co. v. United
    Search
  26. United States v. Los
    Search
  27. Compare United States v. Atlanta
    Search
  28. the Circuit Court of Appeals. Chamber of Commerce v. Federal
    Search
  29. Myers v. Bethlehem
    Search
  30. Securities and Exchange Comm'n v. Andrews
    Search
  31. United States v. Illinois
    Search
  32. See Jones v. Securities
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales