Citation network
California Vs. Latimer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 05, 1938
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 255 (1938) U.S. Supreme Court California v. LatimerSearch
-
U.S. 255 (1938) California v. LatimerSearch
-
along the San Francisco waterfront known as State Belt Railroad, and operates it in interstate commerce. Sherman v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
the Act shall have been judicially determined, like the expense of the administrative hearings complained of in Myers v. BethlehemSearch
-
Shipping Corp., 303 U. S. 41 , 303 U. S. 50 -51, and Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. PublicSearch
-
support the claim of irreparable injury indispensable to interposition by injunction. Compare Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
if based on an honest belief that the Act is not applicable to a railroad operated by the State. Compare United States v. MurdockSearch
-
Compare Dalton Adding Machine Co. v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
State Corporation Comm'n v. WichitaSearch
-
Compare Shelton v. PlattSearch
-
Compare Cavanaugh v. LooneySearch
-
Compare Federal Trade Commission v. ClaireSearch
-
Dows v. ChicagoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court California v. LatimerSearch
-
Sherman v. UnitedSearch
-
Myers v. BethlehemSearch
-
and Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. PublicSearch
-
Compare Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
the State. Compare United States v. MurdockSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial