Citation network
Honeyman Vs. Hanan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 01, 1937
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 14 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court Honeyman v. HananSearch
-
U.S. 14 (1937) Honeyman v. HananSearch
-
jurisdiction, but that its decision of the federal question was necessary to the determination of the cause. Lynch v. NewSearch
-
record a federal question which otherwise the record wholly fails to present. In Commercial Bank of Cincinnati v. Buckingham'sSearch
-
decided by the state court was one of the construction of the statute, and not of its validity. In Lawler v. WalkerSearch
-
found to be vague and indefinite, but the Court also restated the above-quoted ruling of Commercial Bank of Cincinnati v. Buckingham'sSearch
-
Id., p. 78 U. S. 39 . This statement was quoted with approval in Powell v. BrunswickSearch
-
County, 150 U. S. 433 , 150 U. S. 439 . The case of Brown v. AtwellSearch
-
decided, or that the judgment as rendered could not have been given without deciding it. Commercial Bank of Cincinnati v. Buckingham'sSearch
-
Lawler et al. v. WalkerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
R.R. Co. v. RockSearch
-
which the certificate referred, and the case was accordingly dismissed. The rule was succinctly stated in Rector v. CitySearch
-
where certificates have been found useful should be read in the light of that fundamental consideration. In Marvin v. TroutSearch
-
U. S. 212 , 199 U. S. 223 , as explained in Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. NorfolkSearch
-
been dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Id., p. 228 U. S. 603 . The record in Cincinnati Packet Co. v. BaySearch
-
too late under the local procedure, a point upon which the state court was the judge. Applying the rule, in Rector v. CitySearch
-
Capital City Dairy Co. v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 243 -244. It was in the light of these decisions that the question was presented in Whitney v. CaliforniaSearch
-
court where it appeared that an appropriate certificate might lead to a better understanding of the record. See Lynch v. NewSearch
-
International Steel Co. v. SuretySearch
-
rested upon an adequate nonfederal ground, and hence we were without jurisdiction. See Commercial Bank of Cincinnati v. Buckingham'sSearch
-
Powell v. BrunswickSearch
-
determined a federal question, it does not appear to have been a substantial one. See Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. NorfolkSearch
-
be applicable to an action upon a collateral bond such as that described in the amended complaint herein. See Klinke v. SamuelsSearch
-
City Bank Farmers' Trust Co. v. ArdleaSearch
-
to state the facts underlying Page 300 U. S. 26 the decision of the federal question. See Patterson v. AlabamaSearch
-
Villa v. VanSearch
-
for appropriate presentation of the question by an amendment of the record as the state court might be advised. Villa v. VanSearch
-
M. Railroad Co. v. RockSearch
-
Henkel v. CincinnatiSearch
-
Incurables v. NewSearch
-
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. SmithSearch
-
Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonSearch
-
Purcell v. NewSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Honeyman v. HananSearch
-
Lynch v. NewSearch
-
In Commercial Bank of Cincinnati v. Buckingham'sSearch
-
In Lawler v. WalkerSearch
-
of Commercial Bank of Cincinnati v. Buckingham'sSearch
-
of Brown v. AtwellSearch
-
Commercial Bank of Cincinnati v. Buckingham'sSearch
-
Rector v. CitySearch
-
In Marvin v. TroutSearch
-
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. NorfolkSearch
-
Cincinnati Packet Co. v. BaySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial