Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

ingels Vs. Morf

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 01, 1937

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 7 linked 22 unlinked
Show
  1. interstate Busses Corp. Vs. Blodgett US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1928
  2. interstate Transit, Inc. Vs. Lindsey US Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1931
  3. Postal Telegraph-cable Co. Vs. Richmond US Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1919
  4. Clyde Mallory Lines Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Dec 09, 1935
  5. Clark Vs. Poor US Supreme Court · May 31, 1927
  6. Morf Vs. Bingaman US Supreme Court · May 18, 1936
  7. HicklIn Vs. Coney US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1933
  8. U.S. 290 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court Ingels v. Morf
    Search
  9. U.S. 290 (1937) Ingels v. Morf
    Search
  10. Id. (4) The licensing provisions therefore impose an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. Morf v. Bingaman
    Search
  11. the state highways and for the cost of policing the traffic, including the cost of administering the Act. In Morf v. Bingaman
    Search
  12. of the highways, not shown by the taxpayer to be unreasonable, which the state might lawfully demand. Compare Hendrick v. Maryland
    Search
  13. of providing facilities, or of enforcing regulations of the commerce which are within its constitutional power. Sprout v. South
    Search
  14. U. S. 261 , 296 U. S. 267 . This may appear from the statute itself, Morf v. Bingaman
    Search
  15. U. S. 554 , 274 U. S. 557 , or from the use of the money collected, to defray such expense. Hicklin v. Coney
    Search
  16. Kane v. New
    Search
  17. Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Georgia
    Search
  18. Interstate Busses Corp. v. Blodgett
    Search
  19. a), 9(d). See Interstate Transit, Inc. v. Lindsey
    Search
  20. from the statute, and from its provision that the permit is prerequisite to the use of the highways. Compare Morf v. Bingaman
    Search
  21. for any other. The burden rests on appellee to show that the fee is excessive for the declared purpose. Hendrick v. Maryland
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Ingels v. Morf
    Search
  23. the Act. In Morf v. Bingaman
    Search
  24. Compare Hendrick v. Maryland
    Search
  25. Sprout v. South
    Search
  26. Kane v. New
    Search
  27. See Interstate Transit, Inc. v. Lindsey
    Search
  28. Compare Morf v. Bingaman
    Search
  29. Hendrick v. Maryland
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial