Citation network
Wright Vs. Vinton Branch
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 29, 1937
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Wright v. VintonSearch
-
Branch - 300 U.S. 440 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court Wright v. VintonSearch
-
Branch, 300 U.S. 440 (1937) Wright v. VintonSearch
-
to initiate proceedings leading to a stay of foreclosure. P. 300 U. S. 456 . Louisville Joint Stock Bank v. RadfordSearch
-
the following substantive rights of a farm mortgagee, which this Court held in Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSearch
-
F.2d 973) held it invalid. Like decisions have been rendered in other circuits. Lafayette Life Insurance Co. v. LowmonSearch
-
United States National Bank of Omaha v. PampSearch
-
F.2d 493. In the Fifth Circuit, the legislation was sustained. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. DavisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
in Page 300 U. S. 456 Virginia are substantially the same, our decision in Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSearch
-
are not merely a modification of the remedy recognized as permissible. Compare Home Building & Loan Association v. BlaisdellSearch
-
be sold free of encumbrances and the rights of all lienholders be transferred to the proceeds of the sale. Van Huffel v. HarkelrodeSearch
-
or delay preparation or consummation of a plan of reorganization. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
Steverson v. ClarkSearch
-
F.2d 330, and Knotts v. FirstSearch
-
McWilliams v. BlackardSearch
-
F.2d 328, and Phoenix Joint Stock Land Bank v. LedwidgeSearch
-
F.2d 355, applying the decision in United States National Bank of Omaha v. PampSearch
-
supra, and Schauer v. ProducersSearch
-
Wool & Mohair Co., 86 F.2d 576, applying the decision in Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. DavisSearch
-
under a mortgage deed of trust in Virginia is permitted to bid in the property at the sale. See, e.g., Ashworth v. TramwellSearch
-
Title Insurance Co. of v. IndustrialSearch
-
Everette v. WoodwardSearch
-
Va. 419, 174 S.E. 864. Compare Easton v. German-AmericanSearch
-
Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. DavisSearch
-
Steverson v. ClarkSearch
-
Knotts v. FirstSearch
-
rehabilitation, else he could not have qualified to file his petition at the outset. Compare Tennessee Publishing Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
laws of the several States affecting dower, exemptions, and other property rights. Compare Hanover National Bank v. MoysesSearch
-
Stellwagen v. ClumSearch
-
granted by Paragraph 6 does not exceed limits of authority familiarly exercised by courts. See Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSearch
-
may be had in its interpretation to reports of Congressional committees which have considered the measure ( McLean v. UnitedSearch
-
Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. UnitedSearch
-
of the bill on the floor of Congress by those in charge of or sponsoring the legislation ( Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSearch
-
Richbourg Motor Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
to comparison of successive drafts or amendments of the measure ( United States v. PfitschSearch
-
United States v. GreatSearch
-
show common agreement on purpose as distinguished from interpretation of particular phraseology ( Federal Trade Comm'n v. RaladamSearch
-
Humphrey's Executor v. UnitedSearch
-
upon the deliberate intention to meet the constitutional objections raised in Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSearch
-
See Shepherd v. PepperSearch
-
Thompson v. PhenixSearch
-
Compare Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial