Citation network
West Coast Hotel Co. Vs. Parrish
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 29, 1937
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 379 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSearch
-
U.S. 379 (1937) West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSearch
-
et seq. ) providing for the establishment of minimum wages for women, held valid. Adkins v. Children'sSearch
-
Morehead v. NewSearch
-
Court of the State, reversing the trial court, sustained the statute and directed judgment for the plaintiffs. Parrish v. WestSearch
-
P.2d 1083. The case is here on appeal. The appellant relies upon the decision of this Court in Adkins v. Children'sSearch
-
cases ruled by the Adkins opinion, the employee was a woman employed as an elevator operator in a hotel. Adkins v. LyonsSearch
-
U. S. 525 , at p. 261 U. S. 542 . The recent case of Morehead v. NewSearch
-
ago. Prior to the decision in the instant case, it had twice been held valid by the Supreme Court of the State. Larsen v. RiceSearch
-
Spokane Hotel Co. v. YoungerSearch
-
of 1913 (Oregon) chap. 62. The validity of the latter act was sustained by the Supreme Court of Oregon in Stettler v. O'HaraSearch
-
Ore. 519, 139 Pac. 743, and Simpson v. O'HaraSearch
-
case. The Justices who had dissented in that case bowed to the ruling, and Mr. Justice Brandeis dissented. Murphy v. SardellSearch
-
Donham v. West-NelsonSearch
-
Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuireSearch
-
Thus, statutes have been sustained limiting employment in underground mines and smelters to eight hours a day ( Holden v. HardySearch
-
in cash of store orders or other evidences of indebtedness issued in the payment of wages ( Knoxville Iron Co. v. HarbisonSearch
-
in forbidding the payment of seamen's wages in advance ( Patterson v. BarkSearch
-
rates upon the basis of screened coal instead of the weight of the coal as originally produced in the mine ( McLean v. ArkansasSearch
-
in prohibiting contracts limiting liability for injuries to employees ( Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuireSearch
-
in limiting hours of work of employees in manufacturing establishments ( Bunting v. OregonSearch
-
U. S. 426 ), and in maintaining workmen's compensation laws ( New York Central R. Co. v. WhiteSearch
-
regulations designed to insure wholesome conditions of work and freedom from oppression. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuireSearch
-
employees should be deemed competent to make their own contracts was decisively met nearly forty years ago in Holden v. HardySearch
-
protection the State has a special interest. That phase of the subject received elaborate consideration in Muller v. OregonSearch
-
Again, in Quong Wing v. KirkendallSearch
-
power of the State. In later rulings, this Court sustained the regulation of hours of work of women employees in Riley v. MassachusettsSearch
-
U. S. 671 (factories), Miller v. WilsonSearch
-
U. S. 373 (hotels), and Bosley v. McLaughlinSearch
-
relation of employer and employed. Those principles have been reenforced by our subsequent decisions. Thus, in Radice v. NewSearch
-
sustained the New York statute which restricted the employment of women in restaurants at night. In O'Gorman & Young v. HartfordSearch
-
the absence of any factual foundation of record for deciding that the limits of power had been transcended. In Nebbia v. NewSearch
-
that the legislation should be couched in all embracing terms. Carroll v. GreenwichSearch
-
Keokee Coke Co. v. TaylorSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial