Citation network
Stone Vs. White
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 24, 1937
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 532 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court Stone v. WhiteSearch
-
U.S. 532 (1937) Stone v. WhiteSearch
-
of the conflict of the decision below with that of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, United States v. ArnoldSearch
-
of the dower interest, and not taxable as income to her, until they equal the value of the dower interest. Warner v. WalshSearch
-
United States v. BolsterSearch
-
Allen v. BrandeisSearch
-
the beneficiary had been barred by the statute of limitations. After the statute had run, this Court held in Helvering v. ButterworthSearch
-
of the plaintiff, and its control in every case by equitable principles, established by Lord Mansfield in Moses v. MacferlanSearch
-
Burr. 1005 (K.B. 1750), have long been recognized in this Court. See Nash v. TowneSearch
-
U. S. 309 . It is an appropriate remedy for the recovery of taxes erroneously collected, Elliott v. SwartwoutSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Cary v. PageSearch
-
upon the same equitable principles that underlie an action in assumpsit for money had and received. United States v. JeffersonSearch
-
is open to the defendant to show any state of facts which, according to those standards, would deny the right, Moses v. MacferlanSearch
-
Myers v. HurleySearch
-
brought to recover property for the trust estate, will inure to the advantage of the innocent beneficiary. Wetmore v. PorterSearch
-
Zimmerman v. KinkleSearch
-
Atwood v. LesterSearch
-
Franco v. FrancoSearch
-
over to the cestui, is subject to the equitable defense that the cestui has discharged the claim, McBride v. WrightSearch
-
Smith v. BrownSearch
-
That the cestui owes a like amount can be shown by way of equitable plea in set-off, Campbell v. HamiltonSearch
-
Waddle v. HarbeckSearch
-
Ward v. MartinSearch
-
Driggs v. RockwellSearch
-
Wolf v. BealesSearch
-
Agra and Masterman's Bank, Ltd. v. LeightonSearch
-
In an action in general assumpsit, this defense may be shown under the plea of non assumpsit, compare Winchester v. HackleySearch
-
should pay the tax, and only the equitable owner of the fund is ultimately burdened. Cf. United States Paper Assn. v. BowersSearch
-
demanding taxpayer. The statute does not override a defense based on the estoppel of the taxpayer. R. H. Stearns Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Bull v. UnitedSearch
-
Williams v. NeelySearch
-
breach of trust or because of disability, would not have been barred by laches had he brought suit directly. Bridgman v. GillSearch
-
Duckett v. NationalSearch
-
Aultman & Taylor Co. v. MeadeSearch
-
Hart v. ChurchSearch
-
Wilhite v. HamrickSearch
-
Butler v. CarpenterSearch
-
Evans' v. YongueSearch
-
State v. TannerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Stone v. WhiteSearch
-
the Third Circuit, United States v. ArnoldSearch
-
Warner v. WalshSearch
-
Helvering v. ButterworthSearch
-
Moses v. MacferlanSearch
-
Court. See Nash v. TowneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial