Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Texas Vs. Donoghue

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 06, 1937

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 6 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. New York Vs. Jersawit US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1924
  2. United States Vs. Childs US Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1924
  3. Hudson Vs. Guestier US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1808
  4. Huntington Vs. Attrill US Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1892
  5. United States Vs. Stowell US Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1890
  6. Pennoyer Vs. Neff US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  7. U.S. 284 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court Texas v. Donoghue
    Search
  8. U.S. 284 (1937) Texas v. Donoghue
    Search
  9. oil under Texas law is a penalty imposed to vindicate the State's policy of conservation. Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation
    Search
  10. bankruptcy court exercises jurisdiction under sovereignty that is independent of and foreign to that of Texas. Moore v. Mitchell
    Search
  11. Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  12. will recognize that title and direct the trustee to hand over the oil or account for it to the State. Rose v. Himely
    Search
  13. Cranch 293, 8 U. S. 297 . See Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  14. United States v.1960 Bags of Coffee, 8 Cranch 398. See also Clark v. Protection
    Search
  15. Clark v. Protection
    Search
  16. United States v. Stowell
    Search
  17. on the commission of the offense. The judgment is to be in rem, and imports control over the res. Pennoyer v. Neff
    Search
  18. Isaacs v. Hobbs
    Search
  19. and this for the sole purpose of making a forfeiture effective. I deny that any such duty will exist. Cf. Isaacs v. Hobbs
    Search
  20. at the time of a sale pursuant thereto, a title obtained thereunder would be recognized as valid everywhere. Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  21. Rose v. Himely
    Search
  22. Loucks v. Standard
    Search
  23. federal courts are ranked as courts of separate sovereignties, quite as much as the courts of different states. Gwin v. Breedlove
    Search
  24. Moore v. Mitchell
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Texas v. Donoghue
    Search
  26. Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation
    Search
  27. of Texas. Moore v. Mitchell
    Search
  28. the State. Rose v. Himely
    Search
  29. See Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  30. Cf. Isaacs v. Hobbs
    Search
  31. Gwin v. Breedlove
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales