Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Puerto Rico Vs. Shell Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 06, 1937

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

63 entries 5 linked 58 unlinked
Show
  1. Davis Vs. Beason US Supreme Court · Feb 03, 1890
  2. Kopel Vs. Bingham US Supreme Court · Jan 04, 1909
  3. Clinton Vs. Englebrecht US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1871
  4. Hornbuckle Vs. Toombs US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  5. Cope Vs. Cope US Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1891
  6. Puerto Rico v. Shell
    Search
  7. Co. - 302 U.S. 253 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court Puerto Rico v. Shell
    Search
  8. Co., 302 U.S. 253 (1937) Puerto Rico v. Shell
    Search
  9. wherefore there is no risk of double jeopardy. Grafton v. United
    Search
  10. from former territories, are entitled to great weight. P. 302 U. S. 266 . 9. El Paso & N.E. Ry. Co. v. Gutierrez
    Search
  11. U. S. 333 , and Domenech v. National
    Search
  12. would have so varied its comprehensive language as to exclude it from the operation of the act. Dartmouth College v. Woodward
    Search
  13. Ozawa v. United
    Search
  14. United States v. Shagat
    Search
  15. be applied to a dependency now bearing the relation to the United States which is borne by Puerto Rico. In Balzac v. Puerto
    Search
  16. context, the purposes of the law, and the circumstances under which the words were employed. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers v. United
    Search
  17. Helvering v. Stockholms
    Search
  18. within the meaning of the word as used in some statutes, we held in Kopel v. Bingham
    Search
  19. See Porto Rico v. Rosaly
    Search
  20. y Castillo, 227 U. S. 270 , 227 U. S. 274 . Compare Talbott v. Silver
    Search
  21. and incorporated continental territories of the United States, in respect of which this Court said, in Clinton v. Englebrecht
    Search
  22. and, in Hornbuckle v. Toombs
    Search
  23. Cope v. Cope
    Search
  24. In Maynard v. Hill
    Search
  25. Page 302 U. S. 262 with an autonomy similar to that of the states and incorporated territories. Gromer v. Standard
    Search
  26. Porto Rico v. Rosaly
    Search
  27. quasi -sovereignty possessed by the states -- as, for example, immunity from suit without their consent. Porto Rico v. Rosaly
    Search
  28. whether exercising federal or local jurisdiction, are creations emanating from the same sovereignty. See Balzac v. Puerto
    Search
  29. of the laws in the appropriate court necessarily will bar a prosecution under the other law in another court. Grafton v. United
    Search
  30. enforce the federal law, the details of which, instead of being recited, are adopted by reference. See United States v. Press
    Search
  31. The decision was followed by the Supreme Court of Utah in State v. Norman
    Search
  32. was a valid exercise of territorial power notwithstanding the identical legislation by Congress. In Territory v. Guyott
    Search
  33. U.S.Rev.Stats., which defines and punishes the same offense. Territory v. Long
    Search
  34. the Wyoming, Montana, and Utah decisions above cited. The Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona, in Territory v. Alexander
    Search
  35. reaching that conclusion, it expressly rejected the Wyoming, Utah, and Montana decisions upon the authority of Davis v. Beason
    Search
  36. S. 333 , a case which we shall presently consider. 5. There is some general language in El Paso & N.E. Ry. Co. v. Gutierrez
    Search
  37. U. S. 87 , and Davis v. Beason
    Search
  38. territory. The statute is set forth in full in the margin of the opinion of this Court in Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co. v. Sowers
    Search
  39. act, was valid. In that situation, the applicable rule is that formulated by Chief Justice Marshall in Cohens v. Virginia
    Search
  40. Humphrey's Executor v. United
    Search
  41. and cases cited. Page 302 U. S. 270 In the course of the opinion rendered by this Court in Davis v. Beason
    Search
  42. effect which a categorical reading of the words might at first suggest. Only a word need be said about Domenech v. National
    Search
  43. U.S. Supreme Court Puerto Rico v. Shell
    Search
  44. Grafton v. United
    Search
  45. El Paso & N.E. Ry. Co. v. Gutierrez
    Search
  46. and Domenech v. National
    Search
  47. Dartmouth College v. Woodward
    Search
  48. Puerto Rico. In Balzac v. Puerto
    Search
  49. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers v. United
    Search
  50. Compare Talbott v. Silver
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial