Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Helvering Vs. Pfeiffer

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 06, 1937

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 7 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Helvering Vs. Salvage US Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1936
  2. Mount Pleasant Vs. Beckwith US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  3. United States Vs. Blackfeather US Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1894
  4. Landram Vs. Jordan US Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1906
  5. Southern Pine Lumber Co. Vs. Ward US Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1908
  6. Fitchie Vs. Brown US Supreme Court · Dec 07, 1908
  7. Anderson Vs. Atherton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1937
  8. U.S. 247 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court Helvering v. Pfeiffer
    Search
  9. U.S. 247 (1937) Helvering v. Pfeiffer
    Search
  10. Syllabus 1. Section 115(f) of the Revenue Act 1928 exempted dividends of preferred stock from taxation. Helvering v. Cowran
    Search
  11. petition to this Court for a review of the Board's decision, is untenable. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  12. The Commissioner's petition for certiorari was granted in connection with that in Helvering v. Gowran
    Search
  13. f) did not extend to it. We hold, for the reasons stated in paragraph first of Helvering v. Gowran
    Search
  14. the Circuit Court of Appeals erred in failing to hold it taxable income, since, under the rule declared in Helvering v. Gowran
    Search
  15. to him, the Circuit Court of Appeals properly refused to consider the contention. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  16. U. S. 251 below may be sustained without a cross-appeal although it was rested upon a wrong ground, see Helvering v. Gowran
    Search
  17. an appellee cannot, without a cross-appeal, attack a judgment entered below. Compare United States v. American
    Search
  18. Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland
    Search
  19. Bothwell v. United
    Search
  20. her net tax liability for that year, and drew in question every item which entered into computation of the tax. Lewis v. Reynolds
    Search
  21. which is sustained by a correct application of a different rule, is not ground for setting aside its order. Langnes v. Green
    Search
  22. Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland
    Search
  23. of this Court, but in an amount not exceeding that which the Board has found. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Helvering v. Pfeiffer
    Search
  25. Helvering v. Cowran
    Search
  26. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  27. Helvering v. Gowran
    Search
  28. of Helvering v. Gowran
    Search
  29. Compare United States v. American
    Search
  30. Langnes v. Green
    Search
  31. Lewis v. Reynolds
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial