Citation network
Hill Vs. Wampler
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 18, 1936
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 460 (1936) U.S. Supreme Court Hill v. WamplerSearch
-
U.S. 460 (1936) Hill v. WamplerSearch
-
had expired and that his detention had become unlawful. The petition was granted, and the relator discharged. Wampler v. HillSearch
-
Haddox v. RichardsonSearch
-
judicial function. This being so, it must have expression in the sentence, and the sentence is the judgment. Miller v. AderholdSearch
-
Wagner v. UnitedSearch
-
State v. VaughanSearch
-
Manke v. PeopleSearch
-
The only sentence known to the law is the sentence or judgment entered upon the records of the court. Miller v. AderholdSearch
-
inaccurate, there is a remedy by motion to correct it to the end that it may speak the truth. People ex rel. Trainor v. BakerSearch
-
Stratton's Independence v. HowbertSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Dillon v. StrathearnSearch
-
been omitted. A warrant of commitment departing in matter of substance from the judgment back of it is void. Boyd v. ArcherSearch
-
void, and not merely irregular, its nullity may be established upon a writ of habeas corpus. People ex rel. Trainor v. BakerSearch
-
Boyd v. ArcherSearch
-
Biddle v. ShirleySearch
-
Howard v. UnitedSearch
-
Trainor v. BakerSearch
-
in the formal safeguards that protect against mistake, and perhaps against oppression. Cf. Rio Grande Irrigation Co. v. GildersleeveSearch
-
There are times when settled usage is as efficacious as a written rule to fix the forms of practice. United States v. StevensonSearch
-
Norton v. RichSearch
-
Detroit Heating & Lighting Co. v. KempSearch
-
or res judicata does not attach to every ruling upon law made by a judge upon the decision of a motion. Denny v. BennettSearch
-
Riggs v. PursellSearch
-
American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSearch
-
See United States v. WamplerSearch
-
In United States v. WamplerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hill v. WamplerSearch
-
Wampler v. HillSearch
-
Miller v. AderholdSearch
-
Trainor v. BakerSearch
-
Cf. Rio Grande Irrigation Co. v. GildersleeveSearch
-
United States v. StevensonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial