Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Knott

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 25, 1936

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 2 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. New York Vs. Maclay US Supreme Court · Feb 06, 1933
  2. United States Vs. Mack US Supreme Court · May 20, 1935
  3. U.S. 544 (1936) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Knott
    Search
  4. U.S. 544 (1936) United States v. Knott
    Search
  5. The state supreme court had affirmed, with some modification, an order of the trial court. Sub nom. Kelly v. Knott
    Search
  6. in New Jersey. The order of the trial court was affirmed by the Supreme Court, with some modification. Kelly v. Knott
    Search
  7. It is clear that, within the meaning of the section, the company had become insolvent, Bramwell v. United
    Search
  8. Price v. United
    Search
  9. Pierce v. United
    Search
  10. States, 255 U. S. 398 , 255 U. S. 401 -402. See also United States v. Mack
    Search
  11. United States depends entirely upon the statutory provision, and is not an attribute of sovereignty, United States v. State
    Search
  12. surety bonds as having such effect. The cases relied upon dealt with legislation of a different character. Davis v. Pringle
    Search
  13. Mellon v. Michigan
    Search
  14. United States v. Guaranty
    Search
  15. decision is the legal effect upon the asserted federal right of the statute so construed. As was said in Thelusson v. Smith
    Search
  16. See also Beaston v. Farmers'
    Search
  17. company or any later levy. But it is settled that an inchoate lien is not enough to defeat the priority. United States v. Oklahoma
    Search
  18. Spokane County v. United
    Search
  19. after the institution of the liquidation proceeding in New Jersey, did not change substantive rights. And, in State v. Knott
    Search
  20. has been manifested by some proceeding equivalent to an assignment of all of the debtor's property, United States v. Oklahoma
    Search
  21. assignment. But this requirement of the statute was satisfied by the liquidation suit in New Jersey. United States v. Butterworth-Judson
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Knott
    Search
  23. Kelly v. Knott
    Search
  24. Bramwell v. United
    Search
  25. United States v. State
    Search
  26. Davis v. Pringle
    Search
  27. Thelusson v. Smith
    Search
  28. Beaston v. Farmers'
    Search
  29. United States v. Oklahoma
    Search
  30. State v. Knott
    Search
  31. New Jersey. United States v. Butterworth-Judson
    Search
  32. United States v. Hooe
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales