Citation network
United States Vs. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Ry. Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 25, 1936
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
United States v. ElginSearch
-
Joliet & Eastern Ry. Co. - 298 U.S. 492 (1936) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ElginSearch
-
Joliet & Eastern Ry. Co., 298 U.S. 492 (1936) United States v. ElginSearch
-
other unlawful under the commodities clause of the Interstate Commerce Act. P. 298 U. S. 499 . United States v. ReadingSearch
-
and has remained without material change. It was first interpreted here in United States v. DelawareSearch
-
This construction has been accepted and followed in the later cases. United States v. LehighSearch
-
United States v. DelawareSearch
-
United States v. LehighSearch
-
U. S. 266 . Page 298 U. S. 500 Through Mr. Justice Lamar, the Court said, in United States v. DelawareSearch
-
for a railroad company to transport coal belonging to a corporation in which the road held stock. United States v. DelawareSearch
-
the reasoning advanced to support the construction of the Page 298 U. S. 501 act adopted in United States v. DelawareSearch
-
also in direct conflict with the above-quoted language from United States v. DelawareSearch
-
producing companies are but departments of the United States Steel Corporation, and that, as in United States v. ReadingSearch
-
inference derives from any single fact, but out of the mass. The following portion of the opinion in United States v. ReadingSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The lawfulness of the relationship between the holding company and subsidiaries was challenged in United States v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
to control, the possibility of initiating unlawful conditions, is not enough, as clearly pointed out in United States v. DelawareSearch
-
to occur when a single business interest occupies the inconsistent position of carrier and shipper. See United States v. ReadingSearch
-
already forbidden and others inimical to the performance of carrier duties to the public. See Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
company which manufactures and ships the commodity. This was definitely established by the decision in United States v. ReadingSearch
-
are enough to make the transportation unlawful. While it was recognized, as had been held in United States v. DelawareSearch
-
the Steel Corporation and its subsidiaries have been held not to infringe the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. United States v. UnitedSearch
-
of the statute. Whatever views may be entertained of the soundness and wisdom of the decision in United States v. DelawareSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ElginSearch
-
See United States v. ReadingSearch
-
See Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. United States v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial