Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Norris Vs. Alabama

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 01, 1935

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 5 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Neal Vs. Delaware US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  2. Gibson Vs. Mississippi US Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1896
  3. Carter Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1900
  4. Davis Vs. Wechsler US Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1923
  5. Fiske Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · May 16, 1927
  6. U.S. 587 (1935) U.S. Supreme Court Norris v. Alabama
    Search
  7. U.S. 587 (1935) Norris v. Alabama
    Search
  8. counsel, to make an effective appointment of counsel to aid them in preparing and presenting their defense. Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  9. of the State. Summing up precisely the effect of earlier decisions, this Court thus stated the principle in Carter v. Texas
    Search
  10. of the laws is denied to him, contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Strauder v. West
    Search
  11. This statement was repeated in the same terms in Rogers v. Alabama
    Search
  12. U. S. 226 , 192 U. S. 231 , and again in Martin v. Texas
    Search
  13. The principle is equally applicable to a similar exclusion of negroes from service on petit juries. Strauder v. West
    Search
  14. Martin v. Texas
    Search
  15. against action of the State through its administrative officers in effecting the prohibited discrimination. Neal v. Delaware
    Search
  16. supra. Compare Virginia v. Rives
    Search
  17. Thomas v. Texas
    Search
  18. upon us to analyze the facts in order that the appropriate enforcement of the federal right may be assured. Creswell v. Knights
    Search
  19. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. North
    Search
  20. Ward v. Love
    Search
  21. Ancient Etian Order v. Michaux
    Search
  22. made out a prima facie case of the denial of the equal protection which the Constitution guarantees. See Neal v. Delaware
    Search
  23. caused the omission. The court pointed out that the statute fixed a high standard of qualifications for jurors ( Green v. State
    Search
  24. State v. Courts
    Search
  25. as to the many qualified negroes, that it destroys the intended effect of the commissioner's testimony. In Neal v. Delaware
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Norris v. Alabama
    Search
  27. Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  28. the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Strauder v. West
    Search
  29. Rogers v. Alabama
    Search
  30. Strauder v. West
    Search
  31. Compare Virginia v. Rives
    Search
  32. Creswell v. Knights
    Search
  33. See Neal v. Delaware
    Search
  34. Green v. State
    Search
  35. In Neal v. Delaware
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial