Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Roberts Vs. New York City

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 29, 1935

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

49 entries 4 linked 45 unlinked
Show
  1. Appleby Vs. Buffalo US Supreme Court · May 29, 1911
  2. Boston Chamber of Commerce Vs. Boston US Supreme Court · Apr 04, 1910
  3. New York Vs. Sage US Supreme Court · Nov 08, 1915
  4. Hudson County Water Co. Vs. Mccarter US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1908
  5. Roberts v. New
    Search
  6. York City - 295 U.S. 264 (1935) U.S. Supreme Court Roberts v. New
    Search
  7. York City, 295 U.S. 264 (1935) Roberts v. New
    Search
  8. McGovern v. New
    Search
  9. generally, the Fourteenth Amendment is not a guaranty that a trial shall be devoid of error. West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public
    Search
  10. of the right of the owner to be paid for what is taken. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Chicago
    Search
  11. Backus v. Fort
    Search
  12. much will be overlooked when there is nothing of unfairness or partiality in the course of the proceedings. McGovern v. New
    Search
  13. the line of division of dependent upon differences of degree too subtle to be catalogued. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter
    Search
  14. Klein v. Board
    Search
  15. of Supervisors, 282 U. S. 19 , 282 U. S. 23 . Cf. Davidson v. New
    Search
  16. Seattle, R. & S, Ry. Co. v. Linhoff
    Search
  17. People v. O'Brien
    Search
  18. in New York. Powers v. Manhattan
    Search
  19. R. Co., 120 N.Y. 178, 183, 24 N.E. 295. The foundation stone was laid by the Court of Appeals in Story v. New
    Search
  20. doctrine and indeed enlarged its scope, applying it to lots where the fee of the highway was vested in the city. Lahr v. Metropolitan
    Search
  21. Kane v. New
    Search
  22. York Elevated R. Co., 125 N.Y. 164, 26 N.E. 278. Cf. Muhlker v. N.Y
    Search
  23. Sauer v. New
    Search
  24. aggravated, as, for example, by an added tier of tracks, there was another right to be extinguished. Knoth v. Manhattan
    Search
  25. American Bank-Note Co. v. New
    Search
  26. as if their quality in the new ownership continued what it was before. See, e.g., People ex rel. Manhattan R. Co. v. Barker
    Search
  27. Manhattan R. Co. v. Woodbury
    Search
  28. Stevens v. New
    Search
  29. acquisition by the railway, they are not susceptible of separation from the ownership of the franchise. Kernochan v. New
    Search
  30. Drucker v. Manhattan
    Search
  31. Heard v. City
    Search
  32. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar
    Search
  33. which Hough, J., on one occasion excluded from the reckoning with words of trenchant emphasis. Consolidated Gas Co. v. New
    Search
  34. circumstances, union among the abutters was a shadowy and distant chance. New Page 295 U. S. 284 York v. Sage
    Search
  35. Olson v. United
    Search
  36. U.S. Supreme Court Roberts v. New
    Search
  37. West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public
    Search
  38. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Chicago
    Search
  39. Cf. Davidson v. New
    Search
  40. New York. Powers v. Manhattan
    Search
  41. Story v. New
    Search
  42. Lahr v. Metropolitan
    Search
  43. Cf. Muhlker v. N.Y
    Search
  44. Knoth v. Manhattan
    Search
  45. Manhattan R. Co. v. Barker
    Search
  46. Manhattan R. Co. v. Woodbury
    Search
  47. Kernochan v. New
    Search
  48. Consolidated Gas Co. v. New
    Search
  49. York v. Sage
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial