Citation network
Mccandless Vs. Furlaud
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 11, 1935
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 140 (1935) U.S. Supreme Court McCandless v. FurlaudSearch
-
U.S. 140 (1935) McCandless v. FurlaudSearch
-
moneys fraudulently diverted to the prejudice of creditors. P. 296 U. S. 160 . (4) Old Dominion Copper Co. v. LewisohnSearch
-
promoters and their agents being then the only shareholders, and that, under the doctrine of Old Dominion Copper Co. v. LewisohnSearch
-
unless the liability for such misconduct has been effectually released. Dickerman Page 296 U. S. 157 v. NorthernSearch
-
Brewster v. HatchSearch
-
Erlanger v. NewSearch
-
Gluckstein v. BarnesSearch
-
Yeiser v. UnitedSearch
-
Even for erring directors, however, there may at times be absolution if all the shareholders are satisfied. Holmes v. WillardSearch
-
N.Y. 75, 25 N.E. 1083. The interests affected by approval will shape the power to approve. Old Dominion Copper Co. v. LewisohnSearch
-
subscribing for new shares, were in the plight of those ahead of them and could have no better case. Davis v. LasSearch
-
was by less than all the shareholders and without disclosure of the facts to others. Old Dominion Copper Co. v. LewisohnSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and wantonly excessive. Cost, in and of itself, though far from conclusive, is still evidence of value ( Parmenter v. FitzpatrickSearch
-
N.E. 1032), especially where there is no market value in the strict or proper sense ( Sinclair Refining Co. v. JenkinsSearch
-
by proof that they had been true to their fiduciary duties and that their conduct had been fair and just. Geddes v. AnacondaSearch
-
assets, the gift could have been annulled either by the creditors, directly or in their behalf by a receiver. Casey v. CavarocSearch
-
Hamor v. Taylor-RiceSearch
-
American Can Co. v. ErieSearch
-
Sweet v. LangSearch
-
Gillet v. MoodySearch
-
Pittsburg Carbon Co. v. McMillinSearch
-
their power when shareholders and promoters were in substance the same persons. Cf. California-Calaveras Mining Co. v. WallsSearch
-
Pittsburg Mining Co. v. SpoonerSearch
-
intangible assets as well as tangible, for administration as a trust in accordance with equitable principles. Hollins v. BrierfieldSearch
-
Bosworth v. AllenSearch
-
to bring them back into the trust. These considerations, without more, would separate Old Dominion Copper Co. v. LewisohnSearch
-
escaped through the receipt of some property or money if the amount or value is inadequate. Big Spring Electric Co. v. KitzmillerSearch
-
Commonwealth v. ReadingSearch
-
In re Wyoming Valley Ice Co., 153 F. 787, 793, aff'd sub nom. Wiegand v. AlbertSearch
-
the securities are valid in the hands of innocent purchasers, whatever the consideration ( Guarantee Title & Trust Co. v. DilworthSearch
-
released. There are decisions in Pennsylvania that the Constitution is not self-executing. Grange National Bank v. CollmanSearch
-
incoming shareholders, though the corporation was solvent and there was no injury to creditors. Spangler Brewing Co. v. McHenrySearch
-
as the representative of creditors, and this though they became such after the securities were issued. Bingaman v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Trust Co., 15 F.2d 119, and cases there collected. Cf. Coleman v. TepelSearch
-
Krebs v. OberrenderSearch
-
Finletter v. AcetyleneSearch
-
consent is in derogation of the public policy of the state or the prohibition of a statute. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman'sSearch
-
Kent v. QuicksilverSearch
-
Sheldon Hat Blocking Co. v. EickemeyerSearch
-
Mann v. EdinburghSearch
-
Society of Practical Knowledge v. AbbottSearch
-
plainly within the scope of that exception. There was here a statutory prohibition, rooted in public policy. Gearhart v. StandardSearch
-
stock, which may leave the assets unimpaired, and a withdrawal of cash, which puts the enterprise in peril. Cf. Arnold v. SearingSearch
-
Eureka Mining, Smelting & Power Co. v. LivelySearch
-
by any compact between themselves to make the duty less. In considering the effect of Old Dominion Copper Co. v. LewisohnSearch
-
Byron and Chaucer were purchasers in due course, and not agents and confederates wearing the cloak of purchasers. King v. DoaneSearch
-
Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial