Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Ftc Vs. Algoma Lumber Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 08, 1934

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 26 unlinked
Show
  1. FTC v. Algoma
    Search
  2. Lumber Co. - 291 U.S. 67 (1934) U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. Algoma
    Search
  3. Lumber Co., 291 U.S. 67 (1934) Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma
    Search
  4. and choosing for itself among uncertain and conflicting inferences. Statute and decision ( Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific
    Search
  5. the recommendations of the Bureau will not avail, without more, to control the action of the Commission. Cf. Brougham v. Blanton
    Search
  6. Piedmont & Northern Ry. Co. v. Interstate
    Search
  7. is prejudiced if, upon giving an order for one thing, he is supplied with something else. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Royal
    Search
  8. Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted
    Search
  9. wrongs, the damage to the complainants being classified often as collateral and remote. American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw
    Search
  10. at large, whatever its effect upon individuals asserting the infringement of proprietary interests. French Republic v. Saratoga
    Search
  11. in one territory may generate confusion when carried into another, and must then be given up. Hanover Milling Co. v. Metcalf
    Search
  12. United Drug Co. v. Rectanus
    Search
  13. long perceived, in clinging to a benefit which is the product of misrepresentation, however innocently made. Redgrave v. Hurd
    Search
  14. Rawlins v. Wickham
    Search
  15. Hammond v. Pennock
    Search
  16. is made that the restraining orders are not necessary to protect the public interest ( see Federal Trade Commission v. Royal
    Search
  17. U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. Algoma
    Search
  18. Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma
    Search
  19. Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific
    Search
  20. of the Commission. Cf. Brougham v. Blanton
    Search
  21. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Royal
    Search
  22. American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw
    Search
  23. French Republic v. Saratoga
    Search
  24. Hanover Milling Co. v. Metcalf
    Search
  25. Redgrave v. Hurd
    Search
  26. Federal Trade Commission v. Royal
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales