Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

P. F. Petersen Baking Co. Vs. Bryan

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 08, 1934

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 5 linked 21 unlinked
Show
  1. Plymouth Coal Co. Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1914
  2. United States Vs. Grimaud US Supreme Court · May 03, 1911
  3. Buttfield Vs. Stranahan US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1904
  4. Schmidinger Vs. Chicago US Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1913
  5. Castillo Vs. Mcconnico US Supreme Court · Jan 08, 1898
  6. U.S. 570 (1934) U.S. Supreme Court P. F. Petersen Baking Co. v. Bryan
    Search
  7. U.S. 570 (1934) P. F. Petersen Baking Co. v. Bryan
    Search
  8. That the tolerance so fixed is not unreasonable. Burrs Baking Co. v. Bryan
    Search
  9. The fixing of a maximum weight for each size or class of loaves is not unreasonable. In Burns Baking Co. v. Bryan
    Search
  10. power of the state to protect purchasers of bread from imposition by the sale of short-weight loaves ( Schmidinger v. Chicago
    Search
  11. justice to the bakers, as well as for the convenient enforcement of the statute and regulations. Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. Dey
    Search
  12. not appear that any requirement here involved applies to fancy bread made by appellants or other bakeries. Castillo v. McConnico
    Search
  13. Williams v. Mississippi
    Search
  14. Co. v. Jackson
    Search
  15. delegation of authority appears to be well within the principles established by our decisions. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Garrett
    Search
  16. Oil Co. v. North
    Search
  17. Carolina, 222 U. S. 380 , 222 U. S. 394 . And see St. Louis I.M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Taylor
    Search
  18. Union Bridge Co. v. United
    Search
  19. of fault or negligence, violations will not occur. The facts plainly distinguish this case from Burns Baking Co. v. Bryan
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court P. F. Petersen Baking Co. v. Bryan
    Search
  21. Burrs Baking Co. v. Bryan
    Search
  22. In Burns Baking Co. v. Bryan
    Search
  23. Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. Dey
    Search
  24. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Garrett
    Search
  25. St. Louis I.M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Taylor
    Search
  26. Burns Baking Co. v. Bryan
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales