Citation network
New Jersey Vs. Delaware
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 05, 1934
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 361 (1934) U.S. Supreme Court New Jersey v. DelawareSearch
-
U.S. 361 (1934) New Jersey v. DelawareSearch
-
rudiments of the law of property. The covenant generating the estoppel is commonly one of warranty or seisin. Irvine v. IrvineSearch
-
Van Renesselaer v. KearneySearch
-
Tefft v. MunsonSearch
-
Vanderheyden v. CrandallSearch
-
Denio 9, aff'd, Wendell v. CrandallSearch
-
White v. PattenSearch
-
The effect is the same where the covenant is one for further assurance. Taylor v. DebarSearch
-
Lamb v. CarterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Wholey v. CavanaughSearch
-
Hope v. StoneSearch
-
Norfleet v. RussellSearch
-
the throne when the cause in chancery was heard. The Lord Chancellor, Hardwicke, gave judgment for the Penns. Penn v. LordSearch
-
is in evidence before him. His holding that there was no surrender is in line with Lord Hardwicke's judgment in Penn v. LordSearch
-
for uses merely private, but subject always to the jus publicum, the right to navigate and fish. Commonwealth v. AlgerSearch
-
People v. N.YSearch
-
People v. SteeplechaseSearch
-
where the soil has been conveyed as an incident to the grant or delegation of powers strictly governmental. Martin v. Waddell'sSearch
-
Massachusetts v. NewSearch
-
Martin v. Waddell'sSearch
-
wharves and piers, and this though the title to the foreshore or the bed may have been vested in the state. Yates v. MilwaukeeSearch
-
Town of Brookhaven v. SmithSearch
-
United States v. DernSearch
-
U. S. 352 , 289 U. S. 357 . New Jersey in particular has been liberal in according such a license ( State v. JerseySearch
-
City, 25 N.J.Law, 525), and so, it seems, has Delaware ( Harlan & Hollingsworth Co. v. PaschallSearch
-
State v. ReyboldSearch
-
for the application of the principle that long acquiescence may establish a boundary otherwise uncertain. Vermont v. NewSearch
-
achieved, the precepts to be obeyed in the division of the waters were those of international law. Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySearch
-
the middle of the main channel, when there is one, and not by the geographical center, halfway between the banks. Iowa v. IllinoisSearch
-
Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
Louisiana v. MississippiSearch
-
Arkansas v. TennesseeSearch
-
Arkansas v. MississippiSearch
-
Minnesota v. WisconsinSearch
-
to estuaries and bays in which the dominant sailing channel can be followed to the sea. Louisiana v. MississippiSearch
-
in the words of Holmes, J. ( New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
commonwealths or states united under a general government than for states wholly independent. Per Field, J., in Iowa v. IllinoisSearch
-
S. 10 . Nonetheless, the same test will be applied in the absence of usage or convention pointing to another. Iowa v. IllinoisSearch
-
definition, yet this Court has held that the phrase was intended to be equivalent to the middle of the channel. Iowa v. IllinoisSearch
-
of Paris, just as we applied it to the boundary between Illinois and Iowa, which derives from a treaty of 1763 ( Iowa v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court New Jersey v. DelawareSearch
-
Wendell v. CrandallSearch
-
Taylor v. DebarSearch
-
the Penns. Penn v. LordSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial